RISHI Sunak is prepared to consider taking the UK out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) amid an anticipated spike in migrant arrivals, it has been reported.
The PM and Home Secretary Suella Braverman are finalising plans for the most draconian immigration legislation in British history which will take the UK to the "boundaries" of international law, The Sunday Times reported.
Official estimates suggest there will be a 50% rise in migration on last year with 65,000 arrivals expected.
Senior figures have said if the legislation is ruled unlawful by the European Court of Human Rights, Sunak is happy to look at withdrawing from the ECHR.
READ MORE: PM will find it 'hard to shift' Tory links to sleaze
A source said to be familiar with Sunak's thinking told the paper:"The PM has been clear he wants to introduce legislation that meets our international obligations.
"This bill will go as far as possible within international law. We are pushing the boundaries of what is legally possible, while staying within the ECHR. And we are confident that when it is tested in the courts, we will win.
“But if this legislation gets onto the statute book and is found to be lawful by our domestic courts, but it is still being held up in Strasbourg, then we know the problem is not our legislation or our courts.
“If that’s the case, then of course he will be willing to reconsider whether being part of the ECHR is in the UK’s long-term interests.”
Senior figures say Sunak is prepared to deploy the nuclear option before the General Election if the European court says no to the plans. It could be put at the heart of the Conservative manifesto to draw a sharp line between them and Labour.
The reason for the predicted increase is that large numbers of people are seeking to move from central Asia, particularly Afghanistan, through Turkey and into Europe.
Polling and Tory focus groups show that immigration is in the top three issues for Conservative voters, with the economy and the NHS.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel