OPPOSITION to gender recognition reform among SNP politicians should be “respected like any other conscience issue” according to the party’s Westminster leader.
The statement puts Stephen Flynn at odds with some other prominent figures within the party – including the Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville and fellow MP Alyn Smith, both of whom have suggested those opposed to the plans should quit the SNP.
Speaking to The Guardian, Flynn said: “Within any political parties, there has to be space for people to disagree and to disagree without being disagreeable. I think that’s incredibly important.”
SNP opposition to gender recognition reform should be ‘“respected like any other conscience issue”, according to its new Westminster leader. Thank you @StephenFlynnSNP https://t.co/n13OBv4YWl
— Joanna Cherry KC (@joannaccherry) February 5, 2023
His comments were welcomed by Joanna Cherry, one of the SNP’s most vocal internal critics on gender issues, who tweeted a link to the article with the caption: “Thank you [Stephen Flynn].”
Flynn acknowledged there was “understandable public concern” surrounding the case of two sex offenders who began transitioning from men to women after they were convicted.
One of these, the double rapist Isla Bryson, was briefly housed in segregation at the Cornton Vale women’s prison in Stirling.
READ MORE: SNP rebels should 'question whether they want to stay in party', says minister
His comments come amid a fierce war of words among the differing factions within the SNP, with Stirling MP Smith saying those like Cherry who were opposed to the Scottish Government’s gender recognition reforms should quit the party.
Somerville, who has held roles in Nicola Sturgeon’s cabinets continuously since 2018, said those opposed to the reforms ought to “question” whether the SNP was the right party for them.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel