LIZ Truss has attempted to justify sacking her chancellor – and closest political ally – in the dying days of her doomed premiership.
The former Tory leader said she had to push out Kwasi Kwarteng to “indicate that things were different” as she received “very serious warnings” from her officials that a potential market meltdown was imminent.
In a filmed interview with The Spectator, the magazine’s editor Fraser Nelson asked why Kwarteng had to go if he and Truss “didn’t disagree on anything”.
Truss replied: “You know, I’m… I can’t say it was anything but extremely difficult. But he was in Washington at the time, at the IMF meeting and I was getting some very serious warnings from senior officials that, you know, there could be a potential market meltdown the following week, if I didn’t take action.
Liz Truss: I agreed with everything that Kwasi Kwarteng did.
— PoliticsJOE (@PoliticsJOE_UK) February 6, 2023
Reporter: Why did you sack him?
Liz Truss: ... pic.twitter.com/CcZlBR0WVl
“And I needed to do as much as I could to indicate that things were different and that’s why I took the decision I did.
“And I weighed it up, I weighed it up in my mind about whether I needed to do that. But the reality was I couldn’t in all conscience risk that situation.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon responds to popularity rating drop amid trans prisoner row
It comes amid what is being seen as an attempted political comeback for Britain’s shortest-serving prime minister, who was forced out after just 49 days.
She dismissed Kwarteng, with whom she had cooked up her disastrous financial plans, on October 14 – and resigned just under two weeks later.
The former chancellor’s sacking was a dramatic move and came after his mini-budget which promised tax cuts funded by government borrowing and which was announced, unusually, without an independence financial forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility.
This spooked markets and saw a sharp fall in the value of sterling against the dollar and almost all of its contents were scrapped by the current Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt.
Truss railed against the “powerful economic establishment” and blamed other forces such as a “lack of political support” from Conservative MPs for her failed turn as PM in a 4000-word essay penned for The Sunday Telegraph.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel