JEREMY Hunt has been invited to appear before the Scottish Parliament’s finance committee for a second time after snubbing a previous request via his Chief Secretary last month.
The committee put out a suggestive tweet on Wednesday morning saying it was “keen to have positive relations with UK Government ministers”, reflecting the disappointment among MSPs over the initial rejection from the Chancellor.
John Glen, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, wrote the rejection letter in mid-January saying neither him nor his boss would be attending. The invite was sent at the start of November.
But MSPs are not taking no for an answer and Hunt has been now summoned to the committee for a second time to discuss UK fiscal matters and how these impact on the Scottish Budget.
READ MORE: SNP MP: De facto independence referendum plan 'deficient'
The committee said in a stern letter to the Chancellor that UK tax and spending decisions were “significant” to Scotland and it would have “appreciated” the chance to engage in a constructive evidence session.
The letter from convener Kenneth Gibson (SNP) said: “The Committee is disappointed to receive a response from the Rt Hon. John Glen MP, declining our invitation, particularly given the significant impact of UK Government tax and spending decisions on the overall size of the Scottish Budget. It is also regrettable that you did not respond to our request directly.
“The Chief Secretary’s letter states that he is ‘mindful of parliamentary accountabilities, where the UK Government is accountable to the UK Parliament for its tax and spending decisions’.
This is an opportunity for the UK Prime Minister to put his money where his mouth is in terms of "“as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, I want to work constructively with the Scottish Government to make a difference to the people in Scotland” - we shall see! @RishiSunak https://t.co/0CrASSqZxc
— Michelle Thomson (@MichelleThomson) February 8, 2023
“You may be aware that previous Scottish Parliament finance committees have held positive and constructive evidence sessions with former Chief Secretaries to the Treasury, including the Rt Hon. Liz Truss in 2018, the Rt Hon. David Gauke MP in 2014, and the Rt Hon. Danny Alexander in 2013 and 2010.
“More recently, in 2022, we heard from the Rt Hon. Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, on how post-EU funds are operating in Scotland. The committee would have appreciated you making yourself available in a similar way, particularly given the commitment by the Prime Minister on 13 January 2023 that ‘as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, I want to work constructively with the Scottish Government to make a difference to the people in Scotland’.
“Indeed, we believe that being the first Chancellor to appear before the committee would be a positive experience for all involved.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak makes Scots slaves joke MP Lucy Frazer Culture Secretary
“The committee is keen to continue our positive relations with UK Government Ministers on these important issues and we would therefore hope that you will be able to attend the committee in the near future, such as after the UK Spring Budget in March.”
The committee has given the Chancellor a fresh deadline of March 7 to respond to the invitation.
The letter adds that further devolution and sharing of powers in recent years “has led to budgetary decisions in the UK and Scotland becoming more closely linked”.
It states: “In order to properly scrutinise Scotland’s overall public finances, we therefore consider that we must deepen our understanding of how UK Government decisions affect areas such as the Block Grant, Barnett consequentials in year, and the operation of the Fiscal Framework.”
Areas the committee wishes to discuss include the extent to which the UK Government shares with the Scottish Government in advance the timing and key impacts of its fiscal statements, budgetary decisions and Barnett consequentials.
It also hopes to engage with the UK Government on the details of how it plans to grow the UK economy and reduce inflationary impacts on UK and devolved budgets.
The letter states the committee is becoming “increasingly concerned” that the Review of the Fiscal Framework – an assessment into how funding for the Scottish Government is calculated is now long overdue.
It says: “Borrowing powers and other fiscal flexibilities under the framework have remained the same since 2016, despite the significant challenges since, not least inflation.
“We would therefore welcome an update on when the Terms of Reference for the Fiscal Framework Review will be agreed between the two governments, the timescale for completion of the review, and the date on which the related independent report, which was provided to the governments in October 2022, will be published.”
A Government spokesperson said: “The UK Government is accountable to the UK Parliament for its tax and spending decisions, with the Scottish Government being accountable to the Scottish Parliament.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel