DOUGLAS Ross has been urged to publish more of his tax returns in line with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
The Scottish Tory leader – who earns a salary as an MP and MSP - only revealed one year of his tax returns despite Sturgeon publishing all of hers from 2015/16 onwards earlier this week.
SNP depute leader Keith Brown has described Ross’s move as a “cop out” and called on him to show “full transparency” on his secondary income as a football referee and linesman.
Brown said: “Douglas Ross needs to follow the lead of the First Minister and fully publish his tax returns since 2015/16 instead of the one-year publication we have seen so far.
READ MORE: Daily Mail journalist brands Nicola Sturgeon an 'overstuffed little haggis'
“It is a complete cop-out from him to just give us one financial year when it is already public knowledge that he has received income from his football refereeing and linesman activities during his time as a parliamentarian.
“He had previously ‘forgotten’ to declare £30,000 of income from the SFA and so he needs to be fully open and transparent about what tax he pays on that money too.
“It is not good enough for Douglas Ross to just pick and choose which tax returns he wants to show us.
“If he has nothing to hide then surely he should have no problem with publishing the same number of tax returns as the First Minister has?”
Ross – who takes a reduced MSP salary - made no money from refereeing in the 2021/22 tax year because he was prevented from officiating any matches due to injury during that period, the Scottish Conservatives said.
His tax return showed he received £17,223 pre-tax – paying £6788 to HMRC that year.
This was a pro-rata salary because he only took his Scottish Parliament seat in May 2021, so his income does not amount to a full-year salary.
The Scottish Parliament website shows MSPs who also sit as MPs should receive a salary of £22,221 per year.
He recorded pre-tax income from his job as an MP of £72,821 for the period – paying £18,594 to the state.
His return also showed he had claimed expenses worth £3873 as an MSP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel