UK ministers are getting into “a habit” of snubbing the Scottish Parliament with repeated rejections to address committees and engage with MSPs, it has been claimed.
In the last month Scottish Secretary Alister Jack has declined invitations to the equalities and constitution committees to give evidence on his decision to block the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill, while Chancellor Jeremy Hunt rejected a request to attend the finance committee to discuss UK fiscal matters with MSPs via his Chief Secretary.
Equalities minister Kemi Badenoch was also guilty of dismissing an invite to the equalities committee, despite her publicly expressing concerns over the GRR legislation.
These repeated snubs have fuelled a sense among many MSPs that the Parliament is being treated with increasing contempt.
READ MORE: Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanks Scotland during speech at Westminster
Maggie Chapman, who sits on the equalities committee, said UK ministers’ apparent attitude towards Holyrood does nothing for their “Union of equals” claims.
The Green MSP told The National: “This is becoming a habit. The message that the UK Government is sending is one of contempt for the Scottish Parliament and for devolution.
"Whether it is their unprecedented and anti-democratic decision to block Gender Recognition Reform or their catastrophic handling of the economy, the Tories need to be held accountable.
"We have been told time and again that the UK is a union of equals, but senior ministers cannot even be bothered to attempt to justify the terrible decisions they have made and the damage that they have done and are doing.
"It is no wonder that the Tories have lost every election in Scotland since 1955, and, if this is their attitude, there will be even more failures ahead. It's time to remove this cruel and incompetent Tory government for good."
READ MORE: Child hid in cupboard from police officer accused of rape, court told
When looking back over the years, these rejections have not been uncommon, but there is a sense UK ministers are more regularly finding ways to avoid meeting with their Scottish counterparts and MSPs - with these four rejections all coming in the space of a few weeks.
Back in July, SNP depute leader Keith Brown attacked the UK Government for an “unacceptable snub” after he was unable to meet with any ministers on a visit to London.
The Scottish Government minister said meetings with then home secretary Priti Patel and defence minister Leo Docherty, which would have taken place, were all declined, while separate requests to meet Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab both went unanswered.
Michael Gove was also accused of disrespecting the Scottish Parliament by continually dodging a grilling on the replacement of vital EU funds with the UK Government’s levelling up agenda. He did eventually appear before the finance committee in February last year after repeatedly failing to commit to a date in 2021.
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson said: “It is for parliamentary committees to approach witnesses to assist with their scrutiny, including UK ministers where decisions may impact on Scottish Government policy or finances. Any follow-up on an invitation is for the relevant committee.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel