THE row between the Scottish Government and local councils has deepened amid reports of possible social care cuts in Glasgow and divisions over teacher numbers.
On Thursday, the Daily Record reported plans to cut £22 million from the social care budget in Scotland’s largest city, including £3.5 million from care home places and £3 million from the self-direct social care budget, based on a leaked document seen by the newspaper.
The cuts could also see the closure of a specialist service to support children living with someone with addiction issues to save £600,000, and cuts to drug rehab funding.
READ MORE: US Congress members tell SNP MPs they are 'aghast' at state of UK
Glasgow has been at the centre of Scotland’s drug deaths crisis in recent years, consistently recording the highest number of deaths of any council area in the country.
It comes as SNP Glasgow council leader Susan Aitken criticised an intervention by SNP ministers to prevent local authorities from cutting teacher staffing numbers, in a bid to maintain a 2021 manifesto commitment.
Meanwhile, the leaked document said the cutting of rehab funding would have an impact on the recovery of people suffering from addiction issues.
“This… will decrease our capacity to offer residential rehab step-down services when the city is struggling with drug-related deaths,” the newspaper reported.
Chris Sermanni, the social work convener in Glasgow for trade union Unison, said: “These proposed cuts are the real consequence of slashing tens of millions of pounds from the social work budget.
“The reality is there are no ‘safe’ or ‘palatable’ cuts.
“Any reduction in funding has a significant impact on the delivery of key services in Glasgow.
“Social work services in the city are at crisis point as it stands, and implementing these cuts would be catastrophic.
“Glasgow needs more money, and our local politicians should be fighting for this, not timidly passing on austerity handed down from Holyrood and Westminster.”
READ MORE: Introducing The Worst of Westminster: The National's new newsletter
A spokesman for the city’s integration joint board, which oversees health and social care, said: “As part of the annual budget-setting process, a cross-party group of councillors works with officers from across the council family to scrutinise and develop options on where savings and investment could be considered.
“The integration joint board will set a budget for the health and social care partnership in the months ahead and it is too early to say what options will be included.”
The report comes as councils look to set their budgets amid a wrangle between local authorities and the Scottish Government.
Ministers have said funding for councils will increase by £570 million in cash terms next year, but local authority body Cosla has said this drops to just £71 million when ring-fenced funding set aside for Government priorities is taken into account.
Last month, reports suggested Glasgow City Council could cut as many as 700 teaching roles to save money, but Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville this week announced a move to stop such cuts, with councils told they would risk having to pay back the money earmarked for teachers to the Scottish Government if not spent for that purpose.
On Wednesday, Aitken said that councils were being treated like “a delivery vehicle for national priorities”.
READ MORE: FMQs live: Nicola Sturgeon faces MSPs amid council funding and gender rows
Writing in the Glasgow Times, Aitken said: “In each of the previous five years, the SNP city administration has ensured we’ve protected education budgets…we will do all we can to keep it that way.
“But it’s absolutely vital to the well-being of our citizens, including our children and young people, that other crucial local government roles and functions that support decent public services and quality of life within the city are recognised and valued.”
A leaked document prepared by Glasgow officials and councillors proposed earlier closing times for primary schools and slashing 800 teaching positions in an attempt to save £51 million from the education budget.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel