I really don’t enjoy the feeling of déjà vu.
Some fellas on the internet claim that there are an infinite number of timelines and realities that run concurrently.
They say that the present you is a construct of both the past and the future you; and you exist in both, simultaneously. Or that might have been a movie I saw.
Academics at the university of TikTok often explain that feeling that you are living through something for a second time as a glitch in the matrix.
On one plane of consciousness you might be eating a bag of Wotsits while watching Eastenders, but in another you could be surfing in a volcano or fighting a triceratops. I think that’s how it works anyway…
Anyway, the reason I mention déjà vu is because there was definitely some sort of glitch in the matrix at this week’s FMQs. It felt very much like watching a repeat. But not in a beloved sitcom kind of way. It was the sort of session that prompted you to consider what evil deeds you must have committed on a different timeline of an alternate universe to deserve such a punishment.
READ MORE: FMQs recap: Nicola Sturgeon blasts Sarwar's 'zero substance' approach to Budget
Douglas Ross kicked things off by asking the First Minister, again, if double-rapist Isla Bryson is a woman. Once again, she didn’t answer the question directly. And once again, Douglas Ross was very annoyed about it. He then asked if criminal Tiffany Scott is a woman. In response, Nicola Sturgeon said that "those in the prison estate are dealt with depending the nature of the crime and the nature of the risk posed – that is demonstrated by the two cases cited here today.’’
After the exchanges between the First Minister and Scottish Tory leader had concluded, there were shouts from the public gallery.
You’ve guessed it: there was yet another protest in the public gallery – the gazillionth one this year – and business had to be suspended while the protester was hauled out.
At this point, my spidey senses were tingling. Didn’t we go thorough this exact sequence of events last week? Had I taken a wrong turn somewhere on BBC iPlayer and ended up in the past?
Last week Anas Sarwar and the First Minister squared off about council funding.
At FMQs this week Anas Sarwar began by saying: "This SNP government is leaving councils the length and breadth of Scotland in a dire position. Despite what Nicola Sturgeon claims, independent analysis shows that the budgets councils have control over have been cut by £304m in real terms.’’ Okay. So far, so spookily similar. But all is not lost.
Last week, Nicola Sturgeon’s retort to Anas Sarwar was that it’s all well and good saying that councils need more money, but where does Scottish Labour propose the Scottish Government cut funding elsewhere to pay for it?
This week – for the sake of our sanity – surely Nicola Sturgeon would mix things up a bit?
The First Minister rose to her feet and the nation held its collective breath.
"Of course, last week, I invited Anas Sarwar to point to other parts of the budget that he thought we could take resources from if he wants us to give more money to local government. He may have sent those to my office, I don’t know, in which case I will look at those – but I suspect he hasn’t come up with any reasonable or realistic or credible proposals to do that.’’
Please join me back here next week when my FMQs round-up hopefully won’t just be a copy and paste job of this week’s.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel