STEPHEN Flynn has said the SNP are “not interested” in becoming the official opposition at Westminster after a poll suggested they could return more MPs than the Tories.
At a Q&A event at the Bay Hotel in Kinghorn, Fife, Flynn was asked what the SNP’s role at Westminster should be and how they balance that with the expectations of the party and the public.
Hosted by SNP Inchkeith, the event saw over 100 independence supporters pack a conference room to question Flynn, deputy leader Mhairi Black and fellow SNP MP Stewart Hosie.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon facing 'media feeding frenzy', warns SNP president
The three MPs fielded questions from the public on the party’s tactics at Westminster, the impact of the gender reform row on independence support, and technical questions on the details of how a de-facto referendum will work and the preferred route ahead of the party’s special conference next month.
Earlier this week a poll for The Telegraph of 28,000 people found that if a General Election was called the Tories would have less seats in the House of Commons than the SNP.
If the poll was accurate, the Tories would win 45 MPs, while the SNP would win 50 and Flynn would become the leader of the opposition.
Speaking ahead of the event, Flynn told The National he had “no interest” in leading the official opposition.
He said: “We are not interested in being MPs, the opposition, or the leader of the opposition.
“Our focus is on Scotland becoming independent. That's our focus now, that's our focus tomorrow and it will be our focus going into a General Election campaign and on the other side of that General Election campaign.”
Asked what the party would do in that hypothetical situation, Flynn added: “Let's get out of there. Let's not focus or think about what we could or couldn't be doing in terms of our role either as a third party or potentially the second largest party, because our focus should be on making sure that we're not and that's the main thing.”
A similar question was asked at the beginning of the event, with the MPs asked to detail what they saw their role as in the House of Commons in the pursuit of independence.
READ MORE: Craig Murray to publish Stewart McDonald's emails after phishing scam
Flynn said: “I saw a newspaper article which said we’re going to be the second largest party at Westminster, who could have ever imagined that?
“I’m not interested in that, I don’t think any Scottish nationalist is interested in that.
“We want to make sure there are no Scottish MPs and Scotland becomes a successful independent country.”
Deputy SNP group leader Black added: “We are there to leave the UK, there is no doubt about that.”
The Paisley MP said the group's job is to “expose how ridiculous the system of Westminster is” while attempting to strike a “healthy balance” of disruption and “playing them at their own game”.
One member of the audience later asked the panel if there were internal party plans for the event of a de facto referendum win and Westminster still says no.
Hosie replied: “That’s where discussion is with many people now when we win, I’ve got no doubt we will win.
“How do we take this mandate to the world and recognise this?
“It’s hard to go beyond that because we don’t know what Westminster's response will be but yes there’s a lot of discussion about that right now.”
More to follow...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel