A LIFESTYLE company received a £25.8 million PPE contract after the new Conservative chair Greg Hands referred the firm to officials in 2020, new documents have suggested.
It is reported that Luxe Lifestyle – which is not believed to have a history of supplying PPE prior to the referral – was referred through the Government’s so-called VIP lane after Hands was approached by a Tory activist named Mark Higton.
Higton, who was a former chair of a Conservative constituency association, was listed as a point of contact on the “Minister Hands/Luxe Lifestyle” contract, documents obtained by the Good Law Project show.
READ MORE: What are the GPC Files and what are Labour counting down to?
An internal audit prepared for the Cabinet Office in 2020 stated that the firm had been referred by an MP.
Luxe Lifestyle says it trades in “specialised design activities”, and had no published accounts at the time of the referral, according to The Guardian.
A freedom of information request later found that nine million items delivered as part of the contract were not used, however Luxe Lifestyle considered its PPE to be in a usable condition and was not told of problems with the PPE order.
A spokesperson for the company said: “Luxe Lifestyle’s contract to supply PPE was negotiated on an arm-length basis through MoD procurement officers, seconded to the DHSC [Department of Health and Social Care]. The company was awarded a single contract for two out of six products offered via a competitive process based on price and availability.
“No minister was ever directly contacted by the company and all products offered were uploaded on to the relevant DSHC PPE procurement website established by the Government at the time of the pandemic for review and assessment alongside other PPE providers. No one at the company has ever contacted or spoken to Greg Hands.”
READ MORE: Government use of ‘VIP lane’ to give multimillion-pound PPE contracts unlawful
A spokesperson for the new Tory party chair Hands said: “Minister Hands forwarded a message from someone who contacted him to the relevant officials. Minister Hands had no further role or involvement in the process, and was unaware of any outcome.”
A UK Government spokesperson added: “Ministers had no involvement in any procurement decisions. During the pandemic, potential suppliers often passed on offers of PPE to MPs, civil servants and ministers. These offers for support were passed to procurement teams for assessment.”
It comes amid a wider focus on the Government’s use of a VIP lane during the pandemic. According to a National Audit Office report into the system, firms referred through the lane saw a success rate for being awarded contracts 10 times better than companies which were not referred.
While usual procurement systems were suspended due to the Covid crisis, the UK Government says it used the same criteria to assess all bids regardless of how they were referred, and all companies had to go through the same checks and clearances.
Last year, the High Court found the use of the VIP lane to be unlawful following a legal challenge by the Good Law Project.
Jolyon Maugham of the Good Law Project said: “The prime minister can smile sweetly and talk about integrity until the cows come home. But facts speak louder than words and the facts here are very grim indeed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel