RISHI Sunak is standing by the under pressure BBC chair while an investigation takes place, after a highly critical report by MPs into his appointment added to calls for Richard Sharp to stand down.
Downing Street said that Sharp retains the support of the Prime Minister, after MPs found the chairman made “significant errors of judgment” by acting as a go-between for a loan guarantee for Boris Johnson.
Sharp is facing calls to quit, with the cross-party committee highly critical that Sharp failed to declare to MPs his role in facilitating the arrangement when he was applying for the job of BBC chair and said he should “consider the impact his omissions will have” on trust in the broadcaster.
They said his actions “constitute a breach of the standards expected of individuals” applying for prominent public appointments.
READ MORE: Richard Sharp saga confirms rules are different at the top
The Prime Minister on Monday said that he would await the outcome of the inquiry ordered by the Commissioner for Public Appointments, even as Labour and SNP suggested Sharp’s position is untenable.
A meeting of the BBC board is reportedly taking place on Monday, with BBC News citing a source claiming that no scheduled meetings were planned this month.
Sharp did not arrange the loan but admitted introducing his friend Sam Blyth, a cousin of Johnson who wanted to help the then-prime minister with his financial troubles, to the Cabinet Office.
A spokesperson for Sharp has said he “regrets” not telling MPs about his involvement with Blyth “and apologises”.
The Prime Minister, on a visit in Oldham, was pressed by broadcasters on whether he had confidence in Sharp.
“This relates to a process that happened before I was Prime Minister, obviously,” he said.
“It is currently being looked at by the independent office of public appointments and that process is ongoing so I can’t speculate or pre-judge the outcome of that, but it is an independent process that is going to look at it and make sure that everything was followed correctly and all the rules and procedures were adhered to and obviously we will wait for that report.”
His official spokesperson, asked by reporters if Sunak had confidence in the BBC chair, said that Downing Street was “confident” the appointment process was followed.
“This was a two-stage process, including assessment by an advisory assessment panel, constituted according to the public appointments code.
“But there is a review into this process and we will look at that carefully.”
Sharp was named as the preferred candidate for the BBC job in January 2021 and the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee backed his appointment but crucially they were not aware of his role in facilitating the £800,000 loan guarantee.
In a strongly worded report they have now suggested Sharp’s failure to come clean could damage the BBC.
“Richard Sharp’s decisions, firstly to become involved in the facilitation of a loan to the then-prime minister while at the same time applying for a job that was in that same person’s gift, and then to fail to disclose this material relationship, were significant errors of judgment, which undermine confidence in the public appointments process and could deter qualified individuals from applying for such posts,” the MPs said.
The committee concluded: “Mr Sharp should consider the impact his omissions will have on trust in him, the BBC and the public appointments process.”
Blyth’s offer of help for the then-prime minister was made in September 2020 and Sharp said he had stressed the need for things to be done “by the book”.
Following the launch of the recruitment process for the BBC chairman role, Blyth contacted Mr Sharp to request an introduction to Cabinet Secretary Simon Case.
Sharp met Johnson before going to see Case and informed him that he would be telling the Cabinet Secretary about Blyth’s offer of financial assistance.
Sharp met Case in December 2020, at which point he “agreed no further participation” in relation to the financial support, in order to avoid any conflict of interest or perception of conflict given his application, the report said.
A spokesperson for Sharp said over the weekend that the BBC chairman “appreciates that there was information that the committee felt that it should have been made aware of in his pre-appointment hearing”.
READ MORE: SNP and Labour call Richard Sharp's position 'untenable' and 'murky'
“He regrets this and apologises,” the spokesperson said.
“It was in seeking at the time to ensure that the rules were followed, and in the belief that this had been achieved, that Mr Sharp acted in good faith in the way he did.”
“At that meeting, and subsequently, it was not suggested by the Cabinet Office that the act of connecting Mr Blyth with Mr Case was something that should be declared, and it was explicitly agreed that by not being party to the matter going forward he would be excluded from any conflict.”
The spokesperson said Sharp “would like to apologise again to the BBC’s brilliant staff given the distraction it has caused”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel