A SCHEME offering voluntary redundancy to Glasgow City Council staff looks set to be extended for three years as the city seeks to close a £60 million funding gap with, in part, a “significant reduction” in staff.
The council, the largest in the country, will set its budget on Thursday, where councillors will have to wrestle with a £60.8 million black hole in finances.
A report to be considered by councillors at the meeting has recommended they extend the authority’s voluntary severance policy for a further three years.
The policy was due to expire in March.
READ MORE: Scottish council funding row deepens over looming social care cuts
The report said: “The proposals to meet the spending gap will require a significant reduction in staffing. Some of this will be delivered via non-filling of vacancies and attrition however voluntary severance will also be required.
“In June 2020, City Administration Committee approved a report proposing a voluntary severance policy from 2020-2023.
“It, however, was designed to operate for a fixed period of three years, that period coming to an end at the end of March 2023.
“It is proposed that those arrangements are continued for a further three years to cover all council staff.”
The budget comes amid increasing financial strife for local authorities, with a number wrestling with similar shortfalls to Glasgow.
Earlier this year, reports emerged of speculative plans that could reduce teacher numbers in the city by as many as 800.
In direct response, both the First Minister and Education Secretary sought to block councils from dropping teacher numbers – a move that would be directly opposed to Scottish Government policy.
Last week, Education Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville announced in Holyrood that ministers would “withhold or recoup” money given to councils specifically to maintain teacher numbers.
The report went on to say there was “uncertainty” around any funding cuts that could result from a move to reduce teacher numbers.
“There is uncertainty around settlement conditions which may be enforced by Scottish Government if local authorities reduce teacher and support for learning workers’ numbers in Education Services,” the report said.
“There are ongoing discussions between Cosla and Scottish Government on this matter.”
READ MORE: Glasgow's Green councillors call for emergency budget summit with MSPs
In an unusual step, the Scottish Labour group in the city, which narrowly missed out on becoming the biggest on the council at last year’s election, announced last week it would not put forward its own budget proposals, meaning the SNP administration would be able to pass its own plans without the need for a deal with any other party.
Meanwhile, the Green contingent on the council will hold a series of visits on Wednesday, with the group’s co-leader, Jon Molyneux, saying ahead of the visits: “With just one day left, Greens across Glasgow are giving voice to those whose livelihoods are at risk, and those communities who will bear the brunt of cuts to services.
“Many of these vital services are already at breaking point, so now is the time to address the challenges the city faces and to explore both immediate and long-term solutions which can be implemented locally or lobbied for via both the UK and Scottish Parliaments.
“This needs all parties to work together in a collective effort in the best interests of the city.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel