THE SNP policy development convener has called for the SNP's special democracy conference to be postponed.
Toni Giugliano told The National that the resolution lodged by the SNP's National Executive Committee (NEC) "no longer holds legitimacy" and it should be "withdrawn, and revised" once a new leader is in place.
He said: “This is a good time for the party to pause, reflect and take stock and allow the next leader to chart a new way forward, post leadership election."
"We need to allow our next leader the time and the space to chart a way forward and therefore, the special conference should be postponed to allow for a leadership election to take place.
"A special conference does need to take place promptly - we can't lose the momentum, energy and contributions that have came from the branches and members."
Giugliano added: “The NEC resolution can no longer stand, in my view. It was put forward by our current leader and as she has reiterated in her own words today that she doesn’t intend to tie her successor to that strategy then we need to give the next leader time and space."
The NEC agreed the wording of a draft resolution in January, to be discussed at its Special Democracy Conference in March.
The preferred option outlined by the First Minister was for the SNP to fight the next General Election as a de facto referendum.
However, an alternative plan has been set out to instead contest the Scottish Parliament election in 2026 on that basis.
Giugliano further stressed: "We must focus our energy now on electing a new leader - and the right leader who can build on Nicola's legacy and secure independence.
"That decision alone is arguably just as important as any strategy we choose to put in place.
"It would be totally unacceptable to agree on a strategy before our next leader is in place - so the focus must now be on running a comprehensive leadership process and hearing from each candidate on their preferred pathway to independence."
A date for the election has not yet been announced. The 2004 election was triggered with the resignation of Swinney on June 24 and concluded on September 3 – just over three months.
The upcoming contest could be expected to last as long. If it does, the SNP’s upcoming special conference to decide the party’s independence strategy would likely be delayed.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel