SCOTTISH business minister Ivan McKee has backed Kate Forbes to become the next First Minister, claiming that her religious views are not “relevant”.
The Finance Secretary, currently on maternity leave, has been one of the top names floated to take over the SNP leadership after Nicola Sturgeon resigned on Wednesday.
While Forbes has not spoken out herself, yet, rumours have been flying that the ambitious MSP would be the best placed to take over.
READ MORE: SNP leadership contest begins to replace Nicola Sturgeon
Meanwhile, Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson is currently the bookies' favourite, and Health Secretary Humza Yousaf said he was “seriously considering” a leadership bid.
With the deadline for nominations set for February 24, there is still plenty of opportunity for candidates to put themselves forward.
While Forbes hasn’t confirmed a leadership bid, she has found support in some quarters of the party, with fellow MSP McKee saying she would stand "head and shoulders above everyone else".
Speaking to Patrick Maguire on Times Radio, he said: "I've considered all the names that have been suggested. And to be honest with you, I think that the candidate that will stand head and shoulders above anyone else, if she chooses to stand, would be Kate Forbes.
"She's a hugely talented individual. She is a real authentic person.
“She's got some remarkable political skills and gauges extremely well with everyone she talks to.”
McKee also said Forbes electoral record showed she had one of the largest votes of support across Scotland in 2021.
He added: “And she is hugely committed to Scotland and the cause of independence...she would be the person to energise the party and indeed the wider yes movement, bring people together to focus on the issues that we need to win the arguments on for independence deliver successful public services and economy across Scotland on the galvanize the support for independence"
READ MORE:
Forbes is a member of the Free Church of Scotland, which has an anti-abortion stance, raising concerns that her religious beliefs would be incompatible with the role, particularly in light of the looming legal battle over Scotland’s gender reforms and the upcoming buffer zones bill.
Asked if Forbes' religious views could be a problem for her staging a leadership campaign, McKee said her stance wouldn't be relevant.
He said: "I don't think it would be. And I'm speaking here as an atheist. And I think if we get to the point where we are saying that people, obviously on faith, can't hold political office because of their faith then I think that that would be a very concerning situation.
“And I think if Kate had a different faith, we absolutely wouldn't be making those kind of comments. So I don't think her faith is in any way relevant. And Kate will speak for herself with regards to her perspective on those issues that you've mentioned and anything else."
McKee also ruled out standing in the leadership race himself: He told the programme: "I've decided that that's not for me.
"I've got a lot to contribute, I believe to the party, to Scotland, and the cause for independence, but I will continue to do that, hopefully as a government minister under the next First Minister."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel