KATE Forbes has said she would not have voted in favour of the Scottish Government's gender reform bill in its current form, in her first interview since entering the SNP leadership race.
The Finance Secretary, who is returning early from maternity leave to enter the contest, spoke to BBC Scotland following her announcement on Monday morning.
She told the BBC that she had "significant concerns" about self-identification for transgender people in Scotland and hinted that she is unlikely to launch a legal challenge against the UK Government for using a Section 35 order if she wins the leadership race.
READ MORE: LIVE: Kate Forbes launches SNP leadership campaign
It comes as competitor Humza Yousaf said it would be "sad" if the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill dominated the SNP leadership race as he launched his own campaign in Clydebank.
Forbes, who was on maternity leave when the bill passed in December, said people she has spoken to want to focus on the cost of living crisis, the NHS and making the case for independence.
The UK Government blocked the legislation from becoming law by using a Section 35 order to stop it from being given Royal Assent.
The move caused uproar amongst Scottish independence supporters, who said it was an attack on Scottish democracy.
Forbes said she would be "loath to challenge" the Tories' decision.
Speaking to the BBC, Forbes said: "I have been on record saying I had significant concerns and therefore bill in its current form I would have struggled to vote for.
"I would not have been able to vote for the principle of self-ID."
Forbes added: "I understand the principle here which is that the UK Government should not overturn Scottish legislation.
"That is an important principle which I hold to.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf not 'wedded' to de facto Scottish independence referendum plan
"But I think on this, seek legal advice and recognise it is not a priority right now for the people of Scotland, who are focused on other things.”
Forbes was also asked if she would have resigned over the gender reform legislation by BBC Scotland editor James Cook.
She said: "That would have been a question of collective responsibility and that would have been a decision that I would have had to take in discussion with colleagues. Obviously, I wasn't there."
Cook asked: "That was handy, wasn't it?"
Forbes replied: "Well, I didn't predict the date at which my daughter would be born and neither did I set the government's timetable so it is certainly nothing that I had control over.
"But I have concerns about self-ID and those concerns remain."
Forbes added that she would have a "grown-up conversation" with the UK Government over what changes they would want to be made to the bill to allow it to become law.
She added: "We would need to ensure that the bill is in their view compatible. This is a bill that's really important.
"You know, I have never been against the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, and so I think we do need to reform it and make it less onerous.
"But in so doing, we need to look at the amendments that would make it compatible, and ensure again that we're not making decisions without listening to all the different voices that are affected."
Forbes was then asked if she believed anyone "born biologically male" should be allowed to self-identify as a woman.
"I don't think self-identification is sufficient," she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel