SNP leadership candidate Kate Forbes has said she is committed to defending the right to have an abortion.
Green MSP Gillian Mackay is aiming to introduce legislation which would stop anti-abortion protesters from gathering outside clinics which outgoing First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had previously said the Scottish Government would back.
In an interview with ITV, Forbes was asked about her views on both the bill and if she supported the right to have an abortion under the current laws.
READ MORE: The inside story of Kate Forbes's troubled SNP leadership bid so far
She said: “I couldn’t conceive of having an abortion myself. I’ve seen my baby at 12 weeks and 20 weeks but yes, I defend the right of women to make use of that legal provision to access abortion.”
Forbes was then asked if this meant she would defend the current law which allows women to have an abortion during the first 24 weeks of pregnancy.
“My position is that I wouldn’t change the law as it stands”, she added.
The topic then turned to Mackay’s bill and what the specifics of working with the Green MSP on this would involve.
“I think with the bill the basis of my position is that nobody seeks a termination lightly. There are emotionally vulnerable women seeking these terminations and they should do so free of fear and harassment”, said Forbes.
“In that sense, the purpose of the bill makes sense. Any bill that is good law needs to make sure its targeted and that’s where I’ve said I’m happy to work with her.”
Meanwhile, Westminster’s Women’s and Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch said she admired Forbes for being “honest”.
Speaking at a Politico event, she said she was “not particularly religious” and supported same-sex marriage but that she would not condemn anyone “for having personal views”.
Badenoch said that it would be very easy for Forbes to “tell lies just so that she could win that election”.
“And she’s not doing that, and I think that that’s something that people need to take into account”, she added.
Badenoch continued: “I actually admire her [Forbes] for not being dishonest. It’s very easy for her to tell lies, just so that she could win that election. And she’s not doing that, and I think that that’s something that people need to take into account.”
Citing her role as Women and Equalities Minister, she added: “To ask me to criticise someone for their religious beliefs, when I’m supposed to be safeguarding it, shows that those people don’t understand equality.
READ MORE: Who's backing who in the SNP leadership race?
“What they want is to use the Equality Act to fight their own personal battles, rather than as a shield to prevent others from discrimination.”
Forbes’s comments come as the Scottish Greens condemned the “disgraceful” and “utterly unacceptable” protests organised by anti-choice campaign groups outside the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Glasgow.
Mackay’s legislation is aiming to create 150 metre sage access zones or “buffer zones” which would stop campaigners from targeting the facilities.
She said: “These protests are a disgraceful attempt to intimidate people out of accessing healthcare. Some of the protesters carry very graphic banners and other protests have seen loudspeakers and megaphones.
“It will be a 40 day gauntlet of harassment. It is utterly unacceptable and has no place in a modern and progressive Scotland.”
She added: “I hope that this is the last year that we see these protests. The introduction of buffer zones will set an important precedent and will be a watershed moment for reproductive rights in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel