THE HEAD of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) is “not at liberty to say” who made the decision to send a transgender double rapist to a women’s prison, she has claimed.
Isla Bryson was convicted in late January and was taken to Cornton Vale – Scotland’s only all-female prison facility – to be held in segregation to await sentencing.
Within days Bryson was moved to the male estate and an urgent review commissioned by Justice Secretary Keith Brown after criticism of the decision from politicians and campaign groups.
The outcome of the review showed the decision was taken by the SPS to take Bryson to Cornton Vale instead of HMP Barlinnie in Glasgow – as was ordered by the judge in the case – while the offender was in transit.
Appearing before the Criminal Justice Committee on Wednesday, SPS chief executive Teresa Medhurst said she would not discuss who made the final decision.
“That decision, as I said earlier, was taken by headquarters,” she said under questioning from Conservative MSP Jamie Greene.
READ MORE: Supermarket vegetable shortage 'could last for months'
When pressed further on who made the decision, she added: “I’m not at liberty to say.
“Normally, there are processes locally and processes nationally and people seek advice through … into headquarters.”
Medhurst went on to say that “ultimately … the position is that I’m accountable for all decisions within the organisation”.
Asked if she felt it was “appropriate” to house a rapist in the women’s estate, Medhurst replied: “There are a really complex set of issues that require to be considered, both in relation to the risks that someone may pose, the risks to themselves, the needs of individuals, the needs of others and the rights of individuals and of others.
“So it’s not a simple process and at the point of time where someone is making a decision on the location of an individual, they will have extremely limited information and make the best decision at that time, given both the circumstances and our policy position.”
READ MORE: The inside story of Kate Forbes's troubled SNP leadership bid so far
The urgent review, which was published earlier this month, recommended communication and information-sharing about newly-convicted prisoners between the prison service, courts and the Crown Office be improved as well as the creation of a “shared justice process” for the admission of transgender people into prisons.
SPS assured the public that Bryson – who committed the rapes while known as Adam Graham – was never in contact with prisoners while at Cornton Vale.
Following the Bryson case, the SPS took the decision to halt the movement of all trans prisoners with a history of violence against women into the female estate.
The incident also coincided with an ongoing SPS review into the handling of trans prisoners.
Due to be completed last summer, Medhurst said it would likely face further delays following the Bryson case, but said she would be “very disappointed” if it was not complete by the end of the year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel