MINISTERS have been accused of putting US financiers ahead of Scottish businesses after it was claimed a key contract in a new scheme was awarded to an American-owned firm.
Tory MSP Maurice Golden raised questions about the forthcoming deposit return scheme's (DRS) administrator, Circularity Scotland Limited (CSL), saying it had awarded a contract for waste management collections to Biffa – which he said was owned by an American hedge fund.
Ministers had refused to extend the scope of Freedom of Information laws to Circularity Scotland, he said, with the Tory branding it a “dereliction of duty that raises questions about procurement practices and dodgy dealings”.
Regarding the contract awarded to Biffa, Golden complained that no small or medium-sized businesses in Scotland were invited to bid for the work.
READ MORE: Laura Kuenssberg's reply to Stephen Flynn labelled 'reprehensible' by James O'Brien
He challenged Green circular economy minister Lorna Slater over this during a debate at Holyrood, with the Tory asking: “Will the minister consider releasing the details of that procurement and explain to SMEs in Scotland why an American hedge fund is more important than them when they face financial ruin as a result of that procurement process.”
Slater said she was “very surprised” to hear a Tory MSP call for a “private enterprise” like Circularity Scotland to be subjected to Freedom of Information.
She also highlighted a £22 million package it announced this week to help address some of the concerns raised by small businesses about deposit return.
The scheme, which will see shoppers charged an additional 20p on every drink they buy in either a glass or plastic bottle or in a can, comes into force from August 16, with producers having until the end of February to sign up to the scheme – something they have to do if they wish to sell their products in Scotland.
Under the Scottish Government proposals, the 20p deposit on cans and bottles will be returned when customers take empty containers back, with Slater saying it would increase recycling rates for such items to 90%.
While opponents at Holyrood and some businesses have urged the Government to push back the start date for the scheme, the minister insisted: “In the context of the current climate emergency, Scotland needs a deposit return scheme now.”
She stated: “It will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by four million tonnes over 25 years.
“It will reduce litter by a third, cutting the £46m of public money – that’s local authority money – spent cleaning up litter every year.
READ MORE: Body discovered in canal in West Lothian town
“It will drive an increase in recycling rates from 50% to 90% of scheme materials.”
But Golden told her that while “improving recycling and reducing litter are goals we all share”, the Government had left preparations for the scheme to “the last minute”.
As a result, he said: “The Scottish Government finds itself in the middle of an almighty mess of its own creation.”
Golden continued: “Producers are being rushed to sign up to a scheme without having full details or costs. If they don’t sign, they can’t sell their products – it’s a lose-lose scenario.”
He called on ministers to establish an immediate review “to consider how we manage to launch this scheme successfully, with the deadline for producer registration to be extended”.
READ MORE: 'Muslim Council of UK' called out after attacking Humza Yousaf
Slater insisted she took “the concerns of small producers very, very seriously”, saying she had met with the sector last week, with further discussions planned for Thursday.
But Labour’s Colin Smyth told her: “We don’t just need the minister to meet producers, we need her to actually listen to the concerns and take more action.”
He added: “There remain a number of issues regarding the scheme as currently proposed that need to be changed.
“These are not concerns of big business lobbying, these are the concerns primarily of small businesses in my region and others simply trying to survive.”
Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur also called for a review of the scheme, saying: “The fact is too many questions remain unanswered, too much uncertainty hangs over the operation of this scheme and there is too much at stake if the Government gets this wrong.
“So again I urge the Government to pause, commission an urgent independent review, and pave the way to making DRS a success here in Scotland as we have seen it be in countries around the world.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel