THE SNP leadership contest timetable gives “enough leeway” for the next first minister to make a decision over whether or not to challenge the UK Government’s use of a Section 35 order, the FM’s official spokesperson said.
The SNP leadership contest is now fully underway, with candidates Humza Yousaf, Kate Forbes, and Ash Regan confirming they each returned enough nominations from party members ahead of the final deadline on Friday.
Each candidate so far has had a different view on how to deal with the row with Scottish Secretary Alister Jack and his decision to stop Scotland’s gender reforms from being given royal assent and becoming law.
READ MORE: SNP leadership hopefuls challenged to appear at 'first major hustings'
The Scottish Government has a three-month period to launch a legal challenge against the move, but after Nicola Sturgeon’s shock resignation concerns were raised that the timetable for the leadership contest could put that in jeopardy.
Yousaf, the current Health Secretary, said he would “absolutely” challenge Westminster’s use of a Section 35 order.
Forbes, during a series of media rounds at the beginning of the week, said she had concerns about the self-ID element of the bill and would not challenge the Section 35 order in court because she doesn’t “believe that is in line with the public’s priorities”.
The Finance Secretary, currently on maternity leave from her government role, added that she would want to have a “grown-up discussion” with the UK Government about the bill, and what changes could be made to allow them to sign off.
Regan, who quit Sturgeon’s government in protest against the reforms of which she has been an outspoken critic, said she would ditch the bill completely if she wins the contest. She was one of nine SNP MSP rebels who refused to back the legislation despite a government whip.
At the post-FMQs briefing in Holyrood, The National asked the First Minister’s spokesperson if work to prepare a legal challenge was still underway despite the SNP leadership contest.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes puts out statement on 'hurt' caused amid equalities row
He confirmed that government officials have been tasked with the work with the leadership contest “in mind”, adding: “It’s being looked at.”
Asked to clarify if there was time for a decision to be made following the leadership contest, as there are clear policy differences between the three candidates on how to move forward, the spokesperson admitted there was a “relatively short window”.
However, he added that a mid-April deadline for the legal challenge would give whoever succeeds Sturgeon enough time to consider their options.
The spokesperson said: “Obviously, that would give enough leeway.”
However, he cautioned: “I’m not giving you an indication that there’s anything imminent on that.”
After the majority of the Scottish Parliament voted in favour of Scotland’s gender reforms before Christmas last year, Jack’s decision to block the bill was decried as an “attack on democracy and devolution”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel