SCOTTISH Labour have seen a “disaster” in the capital after their councillors failed to get their budget through – instead having to back proposals from the opposition.
The failure has led to calls for the leader of Edinburgh Council, Cammy Day, to resign.
Despite having just 13 councillors, Day’s Labour has been in control of a minority administration on Edinburgh Council since the 2022 local elections after they struck a deal with the Tories and LibDems.
READ MORE: Edinburgh City Council: A power-hungry Labour clique has sold its soul for power
On a council with 63 seats, Labour were always going to have to go cap in hand to other parties in order to get their budget over the line.
However, on Thursday afternoon they failed. The party's controversial proposals even saw one of their group, Ross McKenzie, resign from Labour in the middle of the full council meeting.
Claiming Edinburgh was controlled by a "British nationalist majority", McKenzie said: “I know how little work the administration has put into this budget and that could be down to personal failings but it’s also down to the political reality of the need to leave space in our motion for the Tory party.”
Tactical voting from the Greens saw the party’s councillors divide their votes, making Labour’s budget fall at the first hurdle with the fewest votes of all the proposals: one from Labour, one from the Tories, one from the LibDems, and a combined SNP-Green bid.
With theirs out of the running, Labour backed the LibDems’ budget, while the SNP and Greens voted together. As a result the Tories’ budget fell.
Finally, the three Unionist parties were forced to unite around the LibDems’ budget in order to block the SNP-Green proposal.
The passed budget contained a lower council tax rise than Labour had wanted (5% vs 5.75%). It also withdraws the council's commitment to no compulsory redundancies and proposes privatising waste and cleansing services.
Being forced to back an opposition budget was branded a “disaster” for Scottish Labour by SNP group leader Adam McVey, who called on Day to resign as council leader.
READ MORE: 'A new low': Labour panned for 'shameful' move in council meeting row
McVey said: “Labour have had a disaster today. They’ve lost their budget, lost a councilor, and effectively ended the council-house building programme. The city will lose a lot in this budget, housing problems will get worse.
"Labour voted to go down the road of privatising waste and cleansing services, and to end the council’s long-established no compulsory redundancy policy. They could have instead supported the budget proposed by progressive parties.
“Fundamentally, if Labour can’t pass a budget they can’t run the city. I really hope the council leader can show the integrity that’s now required and resign.”
McVey, formerly Edinburgh's council leader, added: "If my budget had been voted down ... I’d have had the integrity to resign."
Marco Biagi, a former Scottish Government minister turned councillor, added on Twitter: “Can Labour run a council with only 12 of the 63 members? Is the leadership of the three-party Unionist alliance shifting?
“And why did Labour councillors vote alongside the Tories for the Lib Dem proposals in the crunch final vote rather than the SNP/Green progressive budget alternative?”
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
Local democracy reporter Donald Turvill has a fuller explanation of the difference between the party's budget proposals here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel