HUMZA Yousaf’s former boss has weighed in over ongoing speculation about his motivations for missing the 2014 equal marriage vote.
Fiona Hyslop, who served as the external affairs secretary at the time, was Yousaf’s boss during his time as a junior minster.
Yousaf is facing questions about why he missed the final vote making same-sex marriage legal in Scotland almost a decade ago. He voted for the policy on its first reading in the Scottish Parliament.
He has insisted he had to meet the Pakistan consul in Glasgow to plead the case of a Scot in the country who was facing execution.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black accuses Kate Forbes of 'intolerance' in attack on leadership bid
But Alex Neil, who oversaw the introduction of gay marriage, said this was untrue and that Yousaf had sought and obtained the permission of then-first minister Alex Salmond to dodge the vote.
Neil claimed the SNP leadership candidate was under pressure from the Muslim community – of which Yousaf is a member – to vote against the legislation and the meeting was a cover so he could avoid backing the policy.
Hyslop told The National: “The only comment I can make is that Humza Yousaf’s track record on equal rights is a matter of public record as was his vote at stage one of the bill, as cabinet secretary for external affairs I did not micro-manage my deputy minister’s diary but although it is nine years ago my recollection is that the issue he met the Pakistan diplomat about was serious and important.”
Neil told Times Radio: “We were having a free vote at stage three … and any minister who wasn't going to vote for the bill, or we wanted to skip the vote, had to get the permission of the first minister to do so.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes takes early lead in poll of SNP voters' leadership preference
“There was a request from Humza, because, in his words, of pressure he was under from the mosque for him to be absent from the vote. And Alex Salmond, the first minister, gave him permission to do that.
“And a ministerial meeting was arranged to take place at exactly the same time as the vote in Glasgow to give Humza cover for not being there."
Speaking to press at a campaign event in Pollokshields on Friday, Yousaf explicitly denied he had deliberately arranged a meeting to avoid the gay marriage vote.
He said: "No, that was not done. It was an unavoidable meeting."
Yousaf said the issue was "clearly being raised nine years on ... in a bid to destabilise my leadership campaign".
The Health Secretary said he had been lobbied by religious groups about the vote, but said that had been true for almost every MSP and that lobbiests had come from a range of different faiths.
Commenting on Twitter on a video from the event in which showed Yousaf denying arranging to miss the vote, Neil wrote: "This is not true. Humza deliberately skipped the vote."
When approached by The National, Salmond declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel