NORTHERN Irish Unionists have been infuriated after a "constitutionally unwise" meeting between the King and the leader of the EU as the Prime Minister finalises a new Brexit deal for the province.
Leading Conservative Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg said it was wrong to involve King Charles in the “immediate political controversy” on the day the Prime Minister will sign a new agreement with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen.
Baroness Arlene Foster, the former Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) leader and first minister of Northern Ireland, said the meeting in Windsor Castle was “crass and will go down very badly”.
Stories differ on how the controversial meeting came to be, with Buckingham Palace saying Charles was acting on “the government’s advice” while Downing Street insisted it was “fundamentally” a decision for the King.
READ MORE: Huge ship – which is a quarter of a kilometre in length – arrives on the Clyde
Charles and the European Commission president will sit down for tea late on Monday after she is expected to sign off on a long-awaited Northern Ireland Protocol agreement with Rishi Sunak.
Rees-Mogg, a former Cabinet minister, said: “It is surprising that The King will meet Ursula von der Leyen today as it antagonises the people the Prime Minister needs to conciliate.
“It is also constitutionally unwise to involve the King in a matter of immediate political controversy.”
Baroness Foster added: “I cannot quite believe that No 10 would ask [His Majesty] the King to become involved in the finalising of a deal as controversial as this one. It’s crass and will go down very badly in [Northern Ireland].
“We must remember this is not the King’s decision but the government who it appears are tone deaf.”
The announcement of Monday’s meeting came despite warnings that it could draw the King, who as head of state is expected to remain politically neutral, into the process of the UK and EU agreeing a deal or be seen as tacitly endorsing it.
Downing Street defended the move to advise the King to meet von der Leyen, saying the Prime Minister “fundamentally” believed the final decision was for Charles.
READ MORE: The real SNP is quickly being exposed, and it only took a week to dismantle the mask
“He firmly believes it’s for the King to make those decisions,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.
He compared the von der Leyen meeting to Charles talking to Poland’s Andrzej Duda or Ukraine’s President. 
“It’s not uncommon for his majesty to accept invitations to meet certain leaders, he has met President Duda and President Zelenskyy recently. He is meeting with the president of the EU today,” the spokesman said.
Asked why the final protocol talks were taking place in Windsor, he said: “There are a number of occasions when these sorts of talks have been held in significant locations, this is no different.”
Conservatives were among those voicing their criticism of the meeting before it was even confirmed, following suggestions the deal would be called the “Windsor Agreement”.
READ MORE: This is what Westminster doesn't want you to read: The McCrone Report in full
And Sammy Wilson, the DUP’s chief whip said the expected meeting would risk “dragging the King into a hugely controversial political issue”.
Topics up for discussion between Charles and the EU chief include climate change and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, though it was unknown if they will discuss Northern Ireland.
A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: “The King is pleased to meet any world leader if they are visiting Britain and it is the government’s advice that he should do so.”
Charles and von der Leyen will meet at Windsor Castle once her commitments elsewhere have been fulfilled.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel