AN independent firm is set to oversee the SNP leadership election amid criticism of Peter Murrell’s role in the contest.
Party CEO Murrell – who is the husband of outgoing First Minister Nicola Sturgeon – has come under fire for his alleged oversight of the race.
SNP officials have, however, disputed this and said he has no oversight of the ballot.
Former Scottish health secretary Alex Neil said it was “not really acceptable” that the SNP boss should be playing a central role and claimed the party hierarchy had a “preferred candidate”.
Supporters of Kate Forbes have accused party headquarters of devising a short, six-week campaign to scupper her bid because she is not due to return from maternity leave until April.
READ MORE: 'Conspiracy' to hide extent of oil wealth from Scots, Tom Devine says
Ash Regan, meanwhile, has insisted having a CEO who is married to the party leader is inappropriate.
An SNP spokesman said: “An independent ballot services company has been appointed by the national secretary to administer the poll.”
The result of the election would be the only voting information provided and would be communicated directly to the SNP’s national secretary at the close of the poll, the party said.
Forbes herself has not given any indication of what she thinks of Murrell’s role.
When asked if Murrell should step aside on Monday, she said: “I think we need fresh faces in the SNP, which is why I’m campaigning for election but ultimately that’s a question for Peter Murrell.”
READ MORE: Scotland's oil funded Margaret Thatcher's transformation of Britain
Kirk Torrance, Regan’s strategic adviser, who formerly worked at SNP HQ, said there were “serious concerns about the potential for bias in the counting of votes”.
Humza Yousaf – who it is reported is the favourite among party chiefs - said internal party reform was needed but did not believe Murrell should stand aside.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel