THE UK Government has been accused of resorting to “last-minute filler debates” in the Commons to use up time amid a light legislative agenda.
The SNP accused ministers of scurrying to fill Commons time with trivial topics amid reports of a Tory “away day” in Windsor to prepare for the next General Election - scheduled on a day of parliamentary business.
The party’s shadow Commons leader, Deidre Brock, said that people were starting to notice the early finishes and a small number of bills passing through the chamber.
The Government has extended the current session of Parliament to last until autumn this year, amid claims it had a packed agenda with too many new laws to pass before May – when the traditionally year-long term was expected to end.
Brock ridiculed reports of the Conservative away day, telling the Commons: “It’s perhaps no surprise though that the Prime Minister would schedule it on a business day.
“Let’s face it, folk are starting to notice there’s an extremely light hand on the Government’s legislative tiller these days.
“Last night, again business finished early, and it’s happening more often despite the big backlog of bills, along with last-minute filler debates. It surely exposes a Government not in control of its agenda or its backbenches.”
Commons leader Penny Mordaunt responded: “She says that we have no business going through this House at the moment. We do have some big bills to come, and she will know we have a lot of bills waiting with their lordships currently.
“But part of the reason why we have not been sitting through the night is because there is quite a lot of agreement in this House about the legislation the Government is passing.
“We’ve had a lot of support from the opposition benches and I think that is part of the reason why she is not having to sit longer hours and doing more.”
The Government’s law-making plans set out in the Queen’s Speech at the opening of Parliament last year were considered to be ambitious, with promises of 33 bills to progress through both the Commons and Lords.
In the ensuing political chaos of Boris Johnson standing down as prime minister, the short-lived tenure of his successor Liz Truss, and the reset of Rishi Sunak’s premiership, it is unclear whether some of these bills will progress.
The Bill of Rights, aimed at reforming human rights law to target small boats crossings, has been shelved and unshelved several times.
Others like the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill have been dropped due to political developments, while pieces of legislation such as the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill are still undergoing days of line-by-line scrutiny in the House of Lords.
MPs will, however, continue consideration of one controversial bill next week, when the Public Order Bill returns for scrutiny.
The Commons will consider Lords amendments to the plans to crack down on "disruptive protests" on Tuesday, March 7.
The final stages of a bill aimed at creating new rules on selectively editing the genes of farm crops, the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill, will also be considered next Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here