ALEX Salmond has said he was made aware that Humza Yousaf had organised a ministerial appointment which clashed with the final vote on equal marriage legislation in 2014.
Speaking to Sky News, Salmond said he was contacted 10 days before the historic vote on the legislation which legalised same-sex marriage in Scotland and told that Yousaf was organising a meeting which would conflict with the final vote.
He said: “My memory is that I was contacted 10 days or so before the vote and told that Humza was arranging a ministerial appointment.
“I’ve discussed it with people who were with me at the time so I know it’s … well, their memory is the same as mine.”
When pressed by Sky News journalist Beth Rigby on the reason given for why Yousaf would skip the vote, Salmond said the assumption was that he was facing pressure from religious groups.
BREAKING: Scotland's former FM Alex Salmond tells Sky's @BethRigby he was contacted 10 days before a historic vote on equal marriage asking if SNP leadership candidate Humza Yousaf could “skip” the vote due to pressure from religious groupshttps://t.co/MFvi5CyfNW
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 2, 2023
📺Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/Ntmy7VUmUU
“I didn’t discuss the thing at great length. The assumption was it was pressure … well, a lot of religions were canvassing. There was no secret there was that.
“But it was a free vote, people could do what they liked. I had ministers who were against equal marriage and who voted against equal marriage and they continued as ministers.
“You asked me what my memory was. Was I contacted to say that Humza had arranged a governmental meeting on the day of the vote – and that was some time before the vote – the answer is yes. I remember that.
“And I remember saying that Alex Neil had to be informed. But there was no question of having to ask permission.
READ MORE: John Swinney to quit government after nearly 16 years
“We just saw an interview where Humza accepted that there was pressure from various communities. But his memory may be different from mine, let’s put it that way.”
It comes after former SNP MSP Alex Neil – who has backed Kate Forbes to become the next leader of the SNP – claimed that Yousaf purposefully arranged the meeting to clash with the stage 3 vote on equal marriage.
Yousaf said he had an “unavoidable meeting” with the Pakistan Consul General at the time of the vote to discuss the case of a Scot with a history of mental illness being held on death row in the country.
He has also cited his vote in favour of the legislation at stage 1 as proof of his commitment to equal marriage.
When asked whether Salmond's recollection was "wrong" by a Sky News reporter, Yousaf said: "Yes. I mean it is the most predictable political intervention I have to say."
He later issued a statement in which he claimed his support for equal marriage was "unequivocal".
NEW: SNP leadership contender Humza Yousaf hits back at @SkyNews exclusive with Alex Salmond who claims Humza organised a meeting to avoid final equal marriage vote due to religious pressure.
— Connor Gillies (@ConnorGillies) March 2, 2023
Former FM recalls getting a phone call ten days before the vote.
Latest interview👇🏽 pic.twitter.com/DSQFeu2BkJ
"As I have said throughout this campaign, I was proud to vote in favour of the Equal Marriage Bill in Scotland's Parliament," he said.
"I have never denied there was pressure on me regarding this vote, but I was vocal about my support for marriage equality at the time and I remain totally unequivocal on that position.
"As your SNP First Minister, and as someone from a minority background myself, I will champion, defend and celebrate equal rights for all to the hilt.”
SNP MSP Joe FitzPatrick, who was the SNP Government's Minister for Parliamentary
Business during the passing of the bill, added:
"I was the Government's Minister for Parliamentary Business at the time.
"All arrangements for Ministers being handed permission to conduct vital government business during votes in parliament were handled and approved by myself.
"While other Ministers did raise concerns about the Bill at the time, Humza was not one of them.
"Humza gave his full backing to the Bill in its first vote through parliament and he continues to be a staunch ally of the LGBTQ+ community to this day and beyond."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel