EDINBURGH Labour is in a desperate battle for its credibility after a humiliating defeat in the city chambers, the Sunday National has been told.
Group leader Cammy Day is leading an unhappy group of Labour councillors after the party’s budget was dumped by the council at a meeting at the end of February, according to sources within the local authority.
Two sources told this paper there was deep dissatisfaction over Day’s leadership – but that none wished to take stewardship of the party following dramatic scenes in the chamber which saw one of their number quit in the middle of the meeting as parties voted tactically to force Labour into accepting a LibDem budget.
READ MORE: Ian Murray urged to take action over Edinburgh's 'disastrous' budget
Gorgie councillor Ross McKenzie, who announced he was leaving Labour mid-speech during the chaotic meeting, took aim at the “British nationalist majority” in the chamber.
He said: “Rather than operating as a council with a 2/3 majority of members who consider themselves somewhere to the left of centre (even accounting for the SNP’s very broad church, where, as we’ve discovered this week, you’re more likely to find a creationist than a socialist), rather than operating on those lines, the council has divided on nationalist lines. It is the British nationalist majority in this chamber that will pass a budget today.
“And if a shared loyalty to King and country doesn’t quite bind them together fully, you can be sure that the lure of special responsibility allowances seals the deal.”
The special responsibility allowance is the extra money given to councillors who take on convenor positions within the council leadership.
Opponents say the LibDem budget contained red lines such as privatising council services and enforcing compulsory redundancies.
In another twist, Day said he would try to reverse these parts of the budget – which he was accused of having not read.
The Sunday National made repeated attempts to contact Day for comment but was told he was unavailable.
Day failed to prepare adequately for the budget, two sources said, with one claiming his party’s budget proposals were a third of the size of a normal submission councillors would consider to determine the council’s finances.
Meanwhile former SNP council leader Adam McVey alleged that the Labour leader had “spent more time organising an upcoming jolly to Taiwan than he had on the budget”. Day is currently under fire over a taxpayer-funded visit to Taipei planned for late March. He has defended the four-day trip as a chance to “develop a friendship with Taiwan”.
It is understood the SNP are considering whether to hold a vote of no confidence in Day – risking his administration collapsing entirely.
Labour were forced into backing a LibDem budget after Green councillors backed the latter party in the first round of voting to eliminate Day’s proposals.
READ MORE: Labour panned for 'shameful' move in Edinburgh Council scrutiny row
It contained “red line” matters such as exploring the privatisation of bin collections and reintroducing compulsory redundancies – an option the Liberals said would save £600,000.
Edinburgh Live reported Day was now seeking to “reverse” these decisions and claimed he had been “ambushed”.
Day is also facing allegations he is only interested in holding onto his role as council leader for the salary – something which roughly trebles his earnings from the £19,571 earned by ordinary councillors.
McVey said: “It’s been a disaster for Labour. Their budget was voted down and a councillor resigned during his budget debate speech as he was so appalled with their close partnership with the Tories.
“Labour claimed no compulsory redundancies and no privatisation of services were their red lines- yet they actively supported a budget which did both.
“The Labour leader then claimed the reason he whipped his group to vote for the LibDem budget was that he hadn’t read it - leaving his credibility in tatters.
“Their group has never been more split, we’re hearing a significant number of them now want the leader to stand down to try and draw a line under what’s been a shambles.
“One Labour councillor has even called on him to step down publicly and more are saying the same in private. One Labour councillor told me Cammy Day had spent more time organising an upcoming jolly to Taiwan than he had on the budget – which appeared pretty obvious.
“When an administrations budget is voted down, they should really resign. They have, by definition lost the confidence of Council and should show the leadership and integrity required to do the right thing.
“As well as a Labour’s credibility evaporating their integrity has taken a battering too.
“They’ve prioritised their own jobs, with around £200,00 of senior responsibility allowances for their group, over any principles they claimed to have."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel