A SECOND teaching union will ballot its members on a new offer to end a long-running dispute, but a senior figure has described the pay rise as “paltry” and hit out at the talks where it was devised.
The NASUWT said on Saturday the latest offer from the Scottish Government and councils “falls short of what teachers have demanded”.
The Education Secretary called it a "historic" offer, which will be "fair, affordable and sustainable" for all involved.
The new offer will see teachers getting a 12.3% increase by April 2023 and it will rise to 14% by 2024.
READ MORE: Scottish Secondary Teachers Association postpones strike action
Last week, the union claimed it had been excluded from talks between the Scottish Government and the EIS – the country’s biggest teaching union.
The EIS announced on Friday it was suspending its planned strike action to ballot members on the offer.
NASUWT general secretary Dr Patrick Roach said: “It comes as no surprise to see this latest pay offer appearing as if from nowhere, following meetings held in the last few days which excluded the NASUWT, in order to cook up this latest proposal.
“This latest pay offer provides only a paltry improvement over the previous offer that was rejected by our members.
“No doubt employers, the Scottish Government and others will want to claim that this offer represents a significant improvement for teachers, when in fact that means another pay cut for the profession.
“The manipulation of future pay award dates cannot disguise the fact that this latest offer falls short of what teachers have demanded and it is likely to be viewed as too little too late.
“We will hear what teachers have to say as we consult our members on this latest offer.”
The union’s national official Mike Corbett said its “campaign of industrial action, including action short of strike action, continues”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel