FORMER prime minister Boris Johnson has put his father, Stanley, forward for a knighthood, according to reports.
The Times writes that Johnson, who left Number 10 last September, has nominated his father as part of his resignation honours list.
A spokesperson for the former PM said: “We don’t comment on honours.”
The newspaper reported that Johnson’s nominations included up to 100 names and that it was “considerably longer” than that of his predecessors Theresa May and David Cameron with the list currently making its way through Cabinet Office vetting.
Responding to the reports, SNP MP Tommy Sheppard said Johnson was “making a mockery” of the system.
READ MORE: SNP TUG tells leadership hopefuls to answer to 'ten key questions'
“The idea that he could nominate his own father for a knighthood and think he could get away with it sums up the arrogance of the man”, he said.
Sheppard added: “His entire honours list should be scrapped without delay. This corrupt, crony-ridden Westminster system – including the honours system – is completely outdated and unfit for purpose.”
In 2021, senior Tory MP Caroline Nokes and a journalist publicly accused Stanley, a former MEP, of inappropriately touching them at Conservative party conferences.
He denied the incidents, saying he had “no recollection of Caroline Nokes at all”.
The former prime minister has previously faced accusations of cronyism after he nominated his brother Jo Johnson for a peerage in 2020.
In years gone by, May nominated 60 people in her resignation honours list while Cameron named 62.
A spokesperson for Stanley did not comment on the nomination.
It was also previously reported that Johnson was looking to name four sitting Conservative MPs for a peerage, including Scottish Secretary Alister Jack and Nadine Dorries, who has since announced she will be stepping down as an MP.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel