A SCOTTISH Greens minister has said his breach of the peace conviction relates to non-violent protest action understood to have occurred at the Faslane nuclear submarine base.
Following the publication of a register of ministerial interests uncovered by The Herald, it was revealed that Scottish Government minister Patrick Harvie has previously been convicted for breach of the peace.
Harvie revealed: "I have previously taken part in a number of nonviolence direct action protests, and have once been convicted of breach of the peace in relation to such a protest."
It is thought the conviction relates to a protest at Faslane in Helensburgh, as Harvie has taken part in numerous demonstrations at the MOD nuclear base.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson: Former PM 'nominates father for knighthood'
The list of ministerial interests had not previously been seen by the public and was obtained following a Freedom of Information request by The Herald.
Ministers are required to declare “all interests which might be thought to give rise to a conflict in relation to their Ministerial office”.
But while the register of interests for MSPs was available for the public to view, the ministerial list was not.
As well as Harvie’s arrest, the list showed that Nicola Sturgeon highlighted her husband Peter Murrell’s share of a house in Portugal.
READ MORE: SNP TUG tells leadership hopefuls to answer to 'ten key questions'
She said: “A share of a house in Portugal is owned by my husband but is not leased or rented out and so I would not consider it relevant to Ministerial interests."
Culture Secretary Angus Robertson also revealed that his wife’s PR company, which includes whisky clients, ruled him out of making decisions regarding alcohol and a proposed ban on its advertising.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel