SNP leadership candidate Humza Yousaf has branded the honours system in the UK as “corrupt to the core” and has called for the House of Lords to be abolished.
The Health Secretary made the comments after Boris Johnson nominated his father Stanley for a knighthood as part of his resignation honours list.
It was also previously reported that Johnson was looking to name four sitting Conservative MPs for a peerage including Scottish Secretary Alister Jack and Nadine Dorries, who has since announced she will be stepping down as an MP.
During a campaign visit to Lanark on Monday, Yousaf said on the honours system: “It’s corrupt to the core, the honours system, and the House of Lords should be abolished.
“It’s an abomination and an affront to democracy.
READ MORE: Seven bizarre Boris Johnson peerage and knighthood honours appointments
“What I would say very clearly is it’s not only Stanley Johnson of course, it’s Alister Jack who’s been awarded a peerage for being a cheerleader for Boris Johnson while he was partying away while the rest of us were in lockdown.
“So Alister Jack should do the decent thing and resign.”
The Times reported that Johnson’s nominations included up to 100 names and that it was “considerably longer” than that of his predecessors Theresa May and David Cameron with the list currently making its way through Cabinet Office vetting.
A spokesperson for the former PM said: “We don’t comment on honours.”
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard said Johnson was “making a mockery” of the system.
In 2021, senior Tory MP Caroline Nokes and a journalist publicly accused Stanley, a former MEP, of inappropriately touching her at Conservative party conferences.
He denied the incidents, saying he had “no recollection of Caroline Nokes at all”.
The former prime minister has previously faced accusations of cronyism after he nominated his brother Jo Johnson for a peerage in 2020.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel