THE Conservatives have taken control over a Scottish council after Labour’s “constitutional games” were blamed for the collapse of the ruling rainbow coalition.
Dumfries and Galloway Council had been led by councillors from the SNP and Labour, with support from independents and LibDems. However, in February the Labour co-leader – Linda Dorward – stepped down citing “clear political and policy differences”.
That left the SNP’s Stephen Thompson as sole leader of the council, leading an unstable coalition without Labour’s backing.
The budget process one month later saw the SNP’s proposals fail, as Labour abstained (except on their own proposals) and the Tories won the votes of one LibDem and two independents.
After the passing of the Conservatives’ budget, Thompson said his position had become untenable and resigned.
The opening at the top of the council led to a leadership race, with both the Tories – the largest group with 17 seats – and Labour (who have eight seats) aiming to take control.
The SNP (11 councillors) abstained, but the Conservatives were able to install their own members at the head of the council thanks to backing again from independents and one LibDem.
Gail MacGregor, the Tory group leader, was elected leader of Dumfries and Galloway Council, while fellow Conservative Malcolm Johnstone was elected depute leader and convener.
The appointments were welcomed by Conservative MSPs including Stephen Kerr, Murdo Fraser, and Finlay Carson.
Excellent news, @TenaciousTory will be a superb leader after years of SNP/Labour chaos https://t.co/J4iG3cbI71
— Murdo Fraser (@murdo_fraser) March 7, 2023
Angus SNP councillor Lloyd Melville said Labour "should be ashamed".
Cameron Garrett, the co-convener of the Dumfries and Galloway Greens, also criticised Labour for the Tory takeover.
He said on Twitter: “The responsibility for this lies squarely with @ScottishLabour playing national politics at a local level.
“We have clearly seen the damage Tories have done in Westminster, now expect people’s lives to be worse off in [Dumfries and Galloway] too.”
It comes after suggestions that Scottish Labour had interfered in order to put an end to the coalition between them and the SNP – which was an embarrassment to Anas Sarwar who had repeatedly pledged his party would do no such thing.
Sarwar hinted he had had discussions with the Labour group in an interview with ITV Representing Border in January.
READ MORE: Former Conservative councillor campaigns for Scottish Labour
He said: “The local Labour group knows clearly what our position is and we both agree that we have to be consistent with our approach throughout the election campaign and post it that we would have no formal coalitions with either the SNP or the Tories."
Independent councillor Dougie Campbell said the Labour group had been "irresponsible" and slammed "interference" from party headquarters.
He said on Twitter: "@dgcouncil ‘progressive’ alliance of Independents, SNP and Labour groups has collapsed as a consequence of the irresponsible behaviour of the Labour Councillors and Labour HQ interference. Well done @AnasSarwar. Mission accomplished.
"I asked for and was given a promise twice by Labour councillors that Scottish Labour HQ wouldn’t interfere in D&G Council governance and today made it very clear that constitutional games were at the heart of their irresponsible actions."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel