THE prospective sale of a Scottish castle to a multimillionaire Brexiteer represents an “existential threat” to the community in the area, it has been warned.
It comes as Kinloch Castle on the Isle of Rum – which has around 40 inhabitants – is up for sale, with Brexit Party donor Jeremy Hosking in negotiations to purchase it.
As it stands the castle, along with much of the Small Isle, is owned by the government agency NatureScot. It said that Hosking – who is reportedly worth some £375 million – aimed “for a charitable trust to restore and conserve Kinloch Castle (below) and its contents, and create and run a hotel business”.
READ MORE: I live on Rum. Here's why its iconic castle should not be sold to one rich man
The agency has also said it does not have the resources to upkeep the castle, which has become a drain on its funding. It said there is an option to let it “decline and ruin”, warning this will “still come at a cost to the public purse of around £1m”.
But locals say there are more options on the table than the binary choice of letting it fall to ruin or selling it to Hosking.
“The Kinloch Castle era on Rum was a dark one,” long-term resident and director of Rum Enterprise Fliss Fraser writes in The National. “The people were in service to the house, rather than the other way around. This cannot be allowed to happen again.”
Fraser argues that one multi-millionaire landowner would wield excessive power over local residents if they were allowed to take control of the castle.
READ MORE: Michael Russell: Allowing Kinloch Castle to fall away would be best idea
She says that while heritage and restoration are key issues – and areas in which Hosking has experience – they are not the only thing to consider. Community empowerment, land reform, the environment, net zero, and sustainability should also be taken into account, Fraser says.
“We are navigating new ground trying to find a solution that meets these requirements, rather than one which is solely met by a single individual with deep pockets.
“In terms of sustainability, Kinloch Castle just isn’t – unless it depends upon extreme wealth.”
The sale of the castle was put on hold in November, with Scottish minister Lorna Slater saying the Government was keen to fund a solution that eased the funding burden on NatureScot and also worked for Rum locals.
The Isle of Rum Community Trust (IRCT), of which Fraser is a former director, is opposed to the sale, previously calling for “detailed and legally binding agreements in place to protect the community”.
The IRCT has raised concerns that Hosking’s plans for the castle would “effectively split [Kinloch] village in two”, a village which the trust owns. They also warned that the Brexiteer wanted to take ownership of Rum’s off-grid power supply, but NatureScot have said this is not part of the proposed deal.
Another group, Kinloch Castle Friends Association, is supporting the sale. However, they are not based on the island, with an address on the group’s website located in Bolton.
The castle has a chequered history, having been constructed by George Bullough, the playboy son of textile magnate John Bullough, from 1897-1900. His father had bought the island as a hunting estate in 1888.
Rum had been inhabited since ancient times but saw its population of some 400 cleared out to make room for sheep in the early 1800s. After the sheep farm went bust, it was sold to the Conservative politician James Gascoyne-Cecil in 1845. It was Gascoyne-Cecil who sold it to Bullough.
Fraser has raised concerns that a sale to Hosking could see similar aristocratic-style ownership of the island, saying that locals “cannot compete with the power that many millions of pounds bring with it”.
The English businessman was ranked 351 on the Sunday Times Rich List in 2019. He has donated to the Tories, to Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party, and millions to Laurence Fox’s Reclaim Party.
A NatureScot spokesperson said: “Discussions on the sale of Kinloch Castle are ongoing with all parties. We will continue to work constructively with the community to deliver new arrangements for the castle and provide long-term benefits to the Isle of Rum.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel