RICHARD Madeley has called Gary Lineker’s comparison of the UK Government’s asylum policies to that of Germany’s in the 1930’s “an insult” and “stupid”.
Appearing on the BBC programme Question Time, Madeley initially defended Lineker’s right to express his opinion about the UK Government’s immigration policies on Twitter.
The Match of the Day presenter has fielded criticism after he said Home Secretary Suella Braverman’s latest move to prevent migrants coming to the UK on small boats from gaining asylum was “immeasurably cruel”.
Downing Street responded by calling Lineker’s comments “unacceptable and disappointing to see” and some Tory MPs have called on the ex-footballer to be sacked from the BBC.
However, Madeley said that Lineker should be allowed to express his opinions under “free speech”.
READ MORE: Duke of Edinburgh title officially passed down to Prince Edward
"Clearly if he was a political journalist, political presenter or interview in any of the areas of the BBC that we’re talking about, like Newsnight, then clearly he shouldn’t have made those comments,” Madeley said.
"Those comments would be a dereliction of duty and deeply compromising to his programme, to himself, future interviews and of course to the BBC which is publicly funded by us.
“But he’s a sports presenter; he talks about football and games and tactics.”
He added: "And quite how having [denying him] the freedom of speech on – not even on any of his programmes – but on his Twitter page, to say anything he likes within in the law, escapes me.
“I think it’s preposterous to say that he should be muzzled and muffled.”
But the Good Morning Britain host then proceeded to call Lineker’s comments “stupid” – even if he did think he should be allowed to make them.
“If he wants to write something stupid then he’s free to do it,” he said.
“Of course, what he wrote this week was preposterous.
"I mean, to draw a parallel between the Nazi regime of the 1930s in Germany to our government or any European government – or the Australian government, which has extremely strict rules against immigration – I think was absolutely absurd and, actually, an insult to the memories of the people who died for freedom.
“And an insult to the minorities and the Jewish nation, who were subject to acts of genocide by the then German dictatorship. And to draw a parallel between that and the Conservative government or any government in Europe, is just stupid. But he’s entitled to be stupid.”
It comes after Andrew Marr called the BBC’s focus on Gary Lineker – and not the immigration policies he was criticising – “utterly mad”.
During his radio programme on LBC, he said: “Most of the media seems utterly gripped by whether or not a sports commentator should have tweeted something rude about the government.
READ MORE: Question Time: Stanley Johnson domestic abuse allegation 'a one off'
“Rather than by the effect of, for instance, the new migration policy or human slavery or little things like whether or not we’re going to get economic growth to the point where we can actually pay food or energy bills.
"Piddling stuff by comparison, I know, with saint or sinner Gary Lineker.
“The Conservatives, despite having one of their own in place as BBC Chairman, Richard Sharp, remain weirdly obsessive about the corporation.
“They blame it for everything in much the same way that farmers look up and blame the weather.
'The news has taken leave of its senses.'
— LBC (@LBC) March 9, 2023
Instead of focusing on issues such as the 'broken' childcare system, the cost of living crisis and slavery, most of the media seems 'utterly gripped' by Gary Lineker's tweet, says a passionate @AndrewMarr9. pic.twitter.com/vZxgjFK4IV
Marr said Lineker's comments have given the Tories "a new stick to beat the BBC with".
He added: "But what complicates all of this is that the BBC seems so keen to be beaten.
“The corporation has been leading its bulletins, not on migration policy or anything else in the real world, but on Gary Lineker. And this is utterly mad.
“I’m afraid, and I say this as a grateful former BBC employee who admires the corporation but left to get his own voice back, that the BBC is well and truly stuffed over this one.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel