RISHI Sunak and the UK Government must abandon plans to spend billions of pounds more on "abhorrent" weapons of mass destruction, the SNP have said.
The Prime Minister will visit the US next week to announce £5 billion of extra cash for defence over the next two years.
The Times has reported a hefty portion of the money will be set aside for the Dreadnought programme that will replace Britain’s ageing submarine fleet which is armed with nuclear weapons.
The SNP defence spokesperson Dave Doogan (below) has accused the Tories of neglecting the UK’s conventional forces amid sweeping cuts to infantry numbers and a host of base closures in recent years.
READ MORE: Subscribe to The National for ONE POUND for three months
He has called on the UK Government to divert funding to ensure the UK’s capabilities were responsibly strengthened.
Doogan said: “The people of Scotland will not be impressed with colossal extra funding for weapons of mass destruction while communities face such material hardship during the Tories’ cost of living crisis.
"For struggling families up and down the country there are far greater priorities than funding nuclear armed submarines.
“We are all aware of the need to consolidate defence and security services in the wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, but funnelling billions more into abhorrent nuclear weapons is not the priority and will not assist Ukraine in their fight for freedom.
“Over 13 years the Tory government has decimated the UK’s conventional forces and capabilities while closing or downgrading bases across Scotland and elsewhere. Infantry numbers in particular are at their lowest point since the war of the Spanish Succession more than 300 years ago.
“If the Government is serious about improving the UK’s defence capabilities they’ll abandon these plans, and divert money to ensure our conventional forces can better confront the threats we face collectively with our allies."
The Dreadnought programme was launched in 2015. It was predicted to cost £31bn at the time and enter service in the 2030s.
The Ministry of Defence has said £12.5bn of this budget had so far been spent on the programme.
However there is reportedly widespread acknowledgement the project wil need more money spent on it.
A Whitehall source told The Times: “This is an extraordinarily complex and critical project and there is an acknowledgment that the existing budget will not be enough to deliver it, given the inflationary pressures we’re seeing."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel