THE BBC is planning to pull part of a David Attenborough series part-funded by charities for fear it might upset Tory politicians and the right-wing press, it has emerged.
According to the Guardian, bosses have decided not to show an episode of the series Wild Isles - which has been part-funded by the WWF and RSPB - because of its themes around the destruction of nature and the backlash this might receive.
The corporation has subsequently been accused of a "dereliction of its duty to public service broadcasting".
The move is said to have angered programme makers and BBC insiders who feel the broadcaster has bowed to pressure from lobbying groups with "dinosaurian ways".
It comes after Match of the Day host Gary Lineker had to be "spoken to" by BBC chiefs after he compared the UK Government's Illegal Migration Bill to Nazi Germany. It was agreed that he will step back from hosting Match of the Day for the time being.
The series - which will begin broadcasting on Sunday - looks at the beauty of the British Isles and is narrated by 96-year-old Attenborough, who has worked for the BBC since the 1950s.
READ MORE: Stewart McDonald calls on SNP candidates to set out foreign policy stances
Five episodes are scheduled to go out in primetime slots on BBC One but a sixth episode looking at at the losses of nature in the UK will not be broadcast along with the others and will only be on iPlayer.
It is understood to include some examples of rewilding, a concept that has been controversial in some rightwing circles.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas (above) said: “For the BBC to censor of one of the nation’s most informed and trusted voices on the nature and climate emergencies is nothing short of an unforgivable dereliction of its duty to public service broadcasting.
"This government has taken a wrecking ball to our environment, putting over 1700 pieces of environmental legislation at risk, setting an air pollution target which is a decade too late, and neglecting the scandal of our sewage-filled waterways, which cannot go unexamined and unchallenged by the public.
“BBC bosses must not be cowed by antagonistic, culture war-stoking government ministers, putting populist and petty political games above delivering serious action to protect and restore our natural world. This episode simply must be televised.”
Senior sources at the BBC said the decision was made to fend off potential critique from the political right.
READ MORE: Fiona Bruce role with domestic abuse charity challenged after Stanley Johnson comment
One source at the broadcaster, who asked not to be named, told the Guardian "lobbying groups that are desperately hanging on to their dinosaurian ways” such as the farming and game industry would “kick off” if the show had too political a message.
They added: “Frankly, this idea that you sort of put it in a separate programme to almost parcel it to one side is disingenuous. Why don’t they integrate those stories into all of them at the time?”
Laura Howard, who produced the programme and used to work at the BBC’s Natural History Unit, said it was not political.
She said: "I think the facts speak for themselves. You know, we’ve worked really closely with the RSPB in particular who are able to factcheck all of our scripts and provide us with detailed scientific data and information about the loss of wildlife in this country.
"And it is undeniable, we are incredibly nature-depleted. And I don’t think that that is political, I think it’s just facts.”
Chris Packham, who presents Springwatch on the BBC, also told the paper: “At this time, in our fight to save the world’s biodiversity, it is irresponsible not to put that at the forefront of wildlife broadcasting.”
A BBC spokesperson said: “Wild Isles consists of five episodes: Our Precious Isles, Woodland, Grassland, Freshwater and Ocean. Saving Our Wild Isles is a separate film inspired by the series that was commissioned by the RSPB and WWF. We’ve acquired it for iPlayer.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel