A THIRD of Scots think Kate Forbes is the best candidate to be Scotland’s next first minister – with a new poll indicating the Finance Secretary may be extending her lead over her rivals.
Pollsters at Panelbase asked Scots which of the three contenders running to succeed Nicola Sturgeon would be the best first minister – with 33% backing Forbes, up by 10 points from a previous poll.
Meanwhile, 18% backed Health Secretary Humza Yousaf as the best candidate for first minister, with this up by three points.
Support for former community safety minister Ash Regan was also up by three points to 10%, according to the poll, carried out for the pro-independence Scot Goes Pop blog.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes says she will be the first minister to lead Scotland to independence
When the 36% of people who did not express an opinion were excluded, the poll showed 53% backed Forbes, ahead of 30% for Yousaf and 17% for Regan.
Panelbase also found Forbes was the most popular of the three candidates among those who voted for independence in 2014 and those who voted for the SNP in both the 2019 Westminster election and the 2021 Scottish Parliament ballot.
It questioned 1,013 people across Scotland, with the research taking place between Tuesday March 7 and Friday March 10.
James Kelly, of Scot Goes Pop, said almost all of the interviews had been carried out after Tuesday – the day of the first TV debate on the leadership contest, where Forbes challenged the record of her rival candidate Yousaf.
Those clashes saw some within the SNP criticise Forbes for her approach, saying she was damaging the party’s record in government.
Kelly said: “At least as far as the general public is concerned, it appears Forbes’s robust approach in debating Humza Yousaf has paid very handsome dividends.”
The research was released at the same time as a separate poll revealed voters think Forbes would perform best when dealing with key areas such as the NHS, the economy, education, crime, transport and the environment.
The Survation poll, for public affairs consultancy Charlotte Street Partners and polling company The Diffley Partnership, found, though, that in all these areas between 41% and 50% of people did not know which of the three candidates would do the best job.
READ MORE: Alan Cumming weighs in on Kate Forbes leadership campaign
With 1,037 people questioned between Wednesday, March 8 and Friday, March 10, the poll found support for Scottish independence was at 45% – the same level achieved in the 2014 referendum – with 53% backing staying in the UK.
This result did not change significantly regardless of who the next Scottish first minister will be.
Speaking about the research, Malcolm Robertson, founding partner at Charlotte Street Partners, said: “Kate Forbes clearly has greater appeal among the public at large on key issues such as health, education and the economy.
“What is fascinating in this election is whether SNP members vote for their next leader and Scotland’s first minister with that wider, long-term perspective or decide on the basis of other reasons.”
Mark Diffley, founder and director at The Diffley Partnership, said: “Our poll shows that voters currently have a more favourable perception of Kate Forbes on the key economic and public policy issues than of her two opponents in the current SNP leadership race.
“Significantly, it is particularly Conservative and Labour voters who give Kate Forbes higher favourability ratings.
“This may suggest that, although none of the candidates look able to shift the dial on party support or independence support immediately, it is the Finance Secretary who may be able to appeal to opposition party supporters in the longer term.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel