HUMZA Yousaf has said he does not agree with one of his Holyrood backers’ call for independence campaigning to be stepped “down a gear”.
Ben Macpherson made the case for a gradualist approach to independence in a column for Scotland on Sunday, saying the country was not yet ready to leave the Union for good.
The Health Secretary, currently campaigning to be the next leader of the SNP, has distanced himself from his supporter’s vision, pledging to “never put independence on the backburner”.
Macpherson caused controversy among some sections of the Yes movement with his call for the SNP to tone down its independence campaigning.
READ MORE: Yessers react to SNP minister's call for gradualist approach to independence
But he was lauded by others for setting out what they described as a more credible strategy.
Asked for his response to the piece, Yousaf said: “I don’t agree with the approach set out.
“I will never put independence on the backburner.
“In the face of the Tory cost-of-living crisis and Westminster’s attacks on Scotland’s democracy, the need for independence is more urgent now than ever before.
“Be in no doubt, as SNP leader and Scotland’s next First Minister, I will take the fight to Westminster by kickstarting the Yes campaign in my first week in office, mobilising the wider Yes movement.”
In response to Macpherson’s calls for independence campaigning to be stepped “down a gear”, Yousaf instead said he would put the Scottish Government into “fifth gear” to make the case for Scotland’s exit from the Union.
READ MORE: Northern Ireland Protocol deal shows Scotland can have the ‘best of both worlds’
He added: “And I will put government into fifth gear to deliver our prospectus for independence, so that we can arm our activists with the material they need, with the facts and figures required to persuade people to back our vision of a socially just independent nation.
“I will, with urgency, restart, re-energise and grow our Yes movement, I will work day and night to ensure we gain our independence.
"We owe nothing less to ourselves, to our children, and future generations to come.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel