THE candidates to succeed Nicola Sturgeon have said the price of SNP support under their leadership for a minority Labour government after the next election would be another independence referendum.
Labour could find itself in need of SNP votes at the next election – predicted to be held some time in 2024 – but Keir Starmer has repeatedly ruled out a deal with the party.
He told members at the Scottish Labour conference last month there would be no pact with the SNP.
Speaking during a Sky News debate in the hours after voting for the next SNP leader officially opened, all three candidates said they would extract another vote to put Starmer in Downing Street.
“Give us the power to hold a referendum, because our democracy and our voice should not be denied any longer,” Health Secretary Humza Yousaf said.
Finance Secretary Kate Forbes said she would work with the party on an issue-by-issue basis, particularly in the fight against poverty, adding: “For anything more, [my price] has got to be another referendum.”
Forbes said she would not “trade poverty for independence”, but said “any support would have to be contingent on another referendum”.
Former minister Ash Regan said: “At the moment, we’re obviously in a political stalemate where Westminster are denying the voice of Scotland being expressed, so a Section 30 order would be an obvious way to go there.”
READ MORE: Sky News poll puts Union support eight points ahead before SNP debate
The Edinburgh debate, the third of its kind so far in the leadership race, was less aggressive than previous affairs, where the candidates – in particular Forbes and Yousaf – repeatedly clashed.
Elsewhere, Forbes’ views on social issues were further probed after the early days of her campaign focused largely on her saying she would not have voted for equal marriage in 2014.
Asked if she would bring in a complete ban on conversion therapy – including the voluntary use of the practice – Forbes stopped short of saying she would, but described it as “abhorrent”.
“My commitment to you is to look carefully at (banning voluntary conversion therapy),” she said.
“What I’m not going to do, because I don’t think any government has done that yet, it is to precede the normal process of legislation.”
She added: “I think people should be allowed to live freely as they choose and I don’t think there should be conversion therapy in existence in Scotland.”
Asked if a gay man should be allowed to seek conversion therapy to change his sexuality, Forbes said: “Well, it’s his choice, but I do not think we should allow conversion therapy.”
The Finance Secretary added: “My position on this is that people should be allowed to live as they choose in a free, tolerant society, and I think the conversion therapy Bill should reflect that.”
Forbes also expressed support for the views of author JK Rowling in her criticism of gender self-identification reforms.
Rowling has been a fervent critic of the changes, which were blocked by the UK Government in January after being passed by MSPs from all parties the previous month.
She has also levelled criticism directly at Ms Sturgeon, posting a picture of herself in a T-shirt branding her a “destroyer of women’s rights”.
Forbes agreed, when asked, that the author was a national treasure, as well as describing her as brave.
When asked if she supported Rowling’s views on gender reforms, she said: “I don’t disagree with her.”
READ MORE: Kate Forbes: MSPs would face 'wrath' of Scots if they refused to appoint FM
Meanwhile Regan struggled on the detail of her currency plan, saying she “can’t give the full details” until it is fully devised by an independence commission she would form on the first day of her leadership.
“This is a credible plan, I can’t give you the full details of how it would work yet, because obviously, we’ve got to go through that process,” she said.
Challenged by host Beth Rigby on the creation of other institutions on top of a central bank, Regan – who said she was the “only hope” for the independence cause – added: “I don’t have the full detail on this at the moment because this is going to be the stuff that will be looked into by senior economists and bankers.
“As first minister, you’re surrounded by civil servants, you have top advisers to be able to advise you on this.”
She went on to say that creating a detailed manifesto in a week as a result of the leadership campaign would be “an impossibility”.
Ballots in the SNP leadership contest opened on Monday, just hours before the debate took place.
Forbes and Yousaf also clashed over their levels of support in the country.
Forbes said: “On the polling, I don’t think that’s where you’re particularly strong.
“I have not only got net positive ratings, I have actually got higher net positive ratings than either of the opposition leaders. That is what matters for an election winner.”
Yousaf replied: “I accept we have to reach out to No voters but it is so important that we don’t lose our own supporters, and the way we do that is by not abandoning our progressive agenda, isn’t that right?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel