THE widely criticised Illegal Migration Bill has cleared a major Commons hurdle amid pleas from backbench Tory MPs – who did not vote against it – for amendments to protect trafficked women, children and modern slavery victims.
The Illegal Migration Bill aims to stop people claiming asylum in the UK if they arrive through unauthorised means, although it has been denounced by the UN's refugee agency as an effective "asylum ban".
The House of Commons voted 312 to 250, majority 62, as the bill passed Second Reading.
READ MORE: Cheers erupt as Stephen Flynn condemns Tory bill at London protest
Home Secretary Suella Braverman said the legislation is needed as people arriving in the UK after crossing the Channel have "overwhelmed our asylum system", before adding there has been "too much" immigration in recent years.
Braverman also said she has been subject to the "most grotesque slurs" for saying "simple truths" about the impact of migration on the country.
A number of Tory MPs raised concerns in the Commons – but none voted against Second Reading of the bill.
Conservative former prime minister Theresa May had warned modern slavery victims will be "collateral damage" and have the door shut on them by measures within the bill, before abstaining on the crunch vote.
May said she is expecting to hold further talks with Downing Street to resolve the issues and also noted how, when home secretary, she took action to respond to people jumping in the back of lorries and cars in a bid to get into the UK.
May said: "But what should be clear from this is whenever you close a route, the migrants and the people smugglers find another way, and anybody who thinks that this Bill will deal with the issue of illegal migration once and for all is wrong."
The bill would enable powers to be granted to detain migrants for 28 days without recourse for bail or judicial review, and then indefinitely for as long as there is a "reasonable prospect" of removal.
Challenges based on modern slavery laws would be barred, and any other legal attempt to stay would be heard overseas – after they are removed.
Conservative former justice secretary Sir Robert Buckland warned the tone of some in his own party is "not appropriate" and said there was a danger of "ineffective authoritarianism" from parts of the Bill, as he expressed "great concern" at the prospect of detaining children.
Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper, writing on Twitter, said: "The Tories Migration Bill is a con that will make chaos worse."
But Conservative former minister Sir John Hayes told the Commons: "Of course Britain should provide a safe haven for people in need, in genuine need. But it is a deceit to pretend the asylum system is not being gamed and the British people taken for a ride."
There were heated exchanges involving both sides of the Commons, with some heckled for their language.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas criticised the "immoral, deeply cruel and divisive" proposal, and ripped up a copy of the Bill at the end of her speech.
Conservative MP Marco Longhi, a member of the Home Affairs Committee, said people were travelling from "the other side of Africa or from other godforsaken country all the way to Calais".
Labour tabled an amendment which sought to block the bill but it was defeated by 249 votes to 312, majority 63.
After the votes, Braverman said in a statement: "Tonight's vote proves what we already knew – the Labour Party cannot be trusted to stop the boats and the gangs that profit.
"Labour not only has no plan to stop the boats, they have no desire to either."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel