STEPHEN Flynn has rejected claims the SNP is facing an “existential crisis” amid perceived infighting within the leadership contest.
The SNP’s Westminster leader appealed to Nicola Sturgeon’s replacement to unite the party when the race ends in two weeks.
Ash Regan, Kate Forbes and Humza Yousaf are vying to become the party’s next leader, with the vote having opened to SNP members on Monday.
In the latest televised debate on Sky News, front-runners Yousaf and Forbes clashed over their public support.
Flynn, who is backing Yousaf along with other SNP heavyweights including Deputy First Minister John Swinney, was asked about disagreements within the party on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Tuesday.
READ MORE: SNP candidates say they'll work with Labour in exchange for indyref2
He said: “No, no, I don’t think there is an existential crisis at all.
“Of course, there’s the wider issue here of the fact that there is quite clearly disagreement in discussion within the party.
“But it’s incumbent upon a new leader once they’re in place to bring everyone together.”
Defending the public disagreements between the candidates – which have included criticisms of social views and Government performances, he added: “I think it is inevitable when you’re in a leadership contest, no matter which party it is, there’s going to be differences of opinion.
“What I would hope for is when we get on the other side of this, once the contest has concluded in a couple of weeks, that we can come together and move forward together.
“I think that’s what members would expect of us, and I think that’s what the public would expect from us as well.”
Flynn also rejected claims he – along with the SNP ‘establishment’ – had endorsed Health Secretary Yousaf amid concern over his lower public rating.
It follows back and forth between the candidates over who is more popular with the public.
A Sky News poll released on Monday found 44% of respondents think Yousaf would be a bad leader, compared to 39% for Regan and 36% for Forbes.
During the live Sky debate, Finance Secretary Forbes said: “On the polling, I don’t think that’s where you’re particularly strong.
“I have not only got net positive ratings, I have actually got higher net positive ratings than either of the opposition leaders. That is what matters for an election winner.”
Yousaf replied: “I accept we have to reach out to No (to independence) voters but it is so important that we don’t lose our own supporters, and the way we do that is by not abandoning our progressive agenda.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel