SNP MP Amy Callaghan has hit out at a Westminster journalist after she was described as “the one with the crutch” in a sketch on parliamentary business.
Callaghan, who suffered a brain haemorrhage in mid-2020 and spent four months in hospital before making a virtual return to the Commons, hit out at The Times’s Quentin Letts on Tuesday afternoon.
The MP said Letts had “debased and humiliated” her through his repeated mentions of her disability.
READ MORE: How did the Scottish Conservatives vote on the Illegal Migration Bill?
He had written: “Eight Scots Nat buttocks shot airborne simultaneously, as if put up by beaters on a country shoot. One of the most mild-mannered of Conservative MPs, Gloucester’s Richard Graham, had just protested that Scots constituencies didn’t take any asylum seekers. ‘Cock a doodle doooooo!’ squawked four SNP women, and they rose faster than jacks-in-the-box.
“Joanna Cherry (Edinburgh South West), levitating like a cartoon fakir, jabbed a finger at the porcelain-delicate Graham. Kirsten Oswald (East Renfrewshire) expostulated, one very cross walrus. Another complainant who jumped to her feet had earlier been on a crutch. A miracle had occurred.”
Letts (above) later referred to Callaghan again, clarifying that she was “the one with the crutch” he had mentioned earlier.
The lines appeared in the print edition of The Times, but appear to have been removed from the online version.
Sharing a photo of the print copy, Callaghan wrote on Twitter: “‘The one with the crutch’. Debased and humiliated to nothing more than the support I need to walk. Lovely.
“Would you say this about someone in a wheelchair @thequentinletts? Or anyone else who had survived a stroke?
“Ableism passed off as Westminster patter. Sickening.”
"The one with the crutch"
— Amy Callaghan MP (@AmyCallaghanSNP) March 14, 2023
Debased and humiliated to nothing more than the support I need to walk. Lovely.
Would you say this about someone in a wheelchair @thequentinletts? Or anyone else who had survived a stroke?
Ableism passed off as Westminster patter. Sickening. pic.twitter.com/IIYtXzgGEW
Richard Graham, the Tory MP who Letts described as “porcelain-delicate”, faced criticism in 2013 after he suggested that women who wore short skirts and high heels were making themselves more vulnerable to rape.
Further, the Gloucester MP’s claim that “Scots constituencies didn’t take any asylum seekers”, reported by Letts, is inaccurate.
According to Oxford University’s Migration Observatory, Scotland hosts 0.7 asylum seekers and 0.7 resettled refugees per 1000 of the population. Among others, this is higher than London, south west England, and the west Midlands.
Letts has also faced claims of misogyny in the past, as well as criticism for his “pathetic” attitude to Scottish accents.
In 2019, the journalist wrote about the play Peter Gynt at London's National Theatre, saying that the “fruity purr" of English actor Oliver Ford Davies had been " a welcome calm ... from the whining Scottish accents".
The Times has been asked for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel