A LEADING charity has spoken out in defence of an SNP politician after a journalist referred to her as “the one with the crutch”.
It comes after Amy Callaghan, who suffered a brain haemorrhage in mid-2020 and spent four months in hospital, condemned Times writer Quentin Letts for describing her through her disability in a Westminster sketch he had penned.
The MP said Letts had “debased and humiliated” her.
He had written: “Eight Scots Nat buttocks shot airborne simultaneously, as if put up by beaters on a country shoot. One of the most mild-mannered of Conservative MPs, Gloucester’s Richard Graham, had just protested that Scots constituencies didn’t take any asylum seekers. ‘Cock a doodle doooooo!’ squawked four SNP women, and they rose faster than jacks-in-the-box.
“Joanna Cherry (Edinburgh South West), levitating like a cartoon fakir, jabbed a finger at the porcelain-delicate Graham. Kirsten Oswald (East Renfrewshire) expostulated, one very cross walrus. Another complainant who jumped to her feet had earlier been on a crutch. A miracle had occurred.”
Letts later referred to Callaghan again, clarifying that she was “the one with the crutch” he had mentioned earlier.
The lines appeared in the print edition of The Times, but were removed from the online version.
On Wednesday, the Stroke Association, the UK’s leading charity for people who have suffered a stroke, spoke out to condemn Letts’s comments.
READ MORE: SNP rebuff calls from leadership candidates to publish membership numbers
The Stroke Association wrote: “We’re incredibly disappointed to see this language used to describe APPG [All-Party Parliamentary Group] on Stroke member @AmyCallaghanSNP.
“After a stroke, the road to recovery can be challenging enough without also facing damaging attitudes that define people by their mobility aids.
“Two-thirds of stroke survivors leave hospital with a disability & many stroke survivors like Amy use mobility aids … “We're pleased to see it omitted from the online version. Comments like this about a disabled politician can negatively shape public attitudes toward disabled people.”
The Times did not respond to a request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel