DEPUTY First Minister John Swinney has said he does not understand why there is a row around the SNP leadership ballot, insisting he is “100%” sure it is being conducted properly.
The former SNP leader, who is backing Humza Yousaf in the race, commented after Kate Forbes and Ash Regan called for independent auditors to be brought in to oversee the vote.
Party members are currently voting for who they want to take over from Nicola Sturgeon as leader in a ballot which opened on Monday and is due to close on March 27.
However, on Wednesday all three camps made public calls for the SNP to publish membership figures to ensure transparency in the race. And later that same day, Forbes and Regan called for auditors to be brought in.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf decries 'baseless smears' as SNP leadership ballot row escalates
Michelle Thomson – who is running the Forbes campaign – said some concerns are “based on hearsay or are from bad faith actors”, but she added: “However, others are being openly expressed by individuals within the SNP of longstanding.”
She argued that the fact questions are being asked at all “can only further undermine trust in SNP HQ”.
Kirk Torrance, who is advising Regan, said on Twitter: “Independent auditors will give reassurance to the SNP members and the general public that this ballot is conducted properly. This should have been the case from the outset.”
The election process is being carried out by Mi-Voice, an election services firm based in Southampton.
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Thursday, Swinney (above) said the firm had a “professional reputation to deliver ballot services effectively and without question”.
He went on: “My experience, and I have got a lot of experience of elections within the SNP, I have been a candidate in many of them, I ran many of them as the party secretary over many years.
“I have also seen this process we are going through just now operating in the election of previous deputy leaders of the party … and nobody, nobody, has raised an issue about the authority of those processes.
“They have been completely straightforward, efficient, independently organised processes, and this is exactly the same.
“So I don’t know what this is all about.”
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Questions for the next first minister the hustings didn't touch
Asked if he is satisfied the election is being conducted “entirely properly”, Swinney said: “100%.”
It comes the day after pressure intensified on the party to release its membership numbers.
SNP accounts published by the Electoral Commission last summer put the party on 104,000 members in December 2021, although reports suggest 78,000 online ballot papers have been sent out in the current leadership election.
All three candidates have called for the publication of the figures, with Regan writing a letter to SNP chief executive Peter Murrell on behalf of herself and Forbes saying the “information is crucial to fostering trust and confidence among the candidates, their campaign teams, and the party members who are participating in the election”.
Regan has issued an ultimatum, saying that she will hold a press conference to escalate the issue further if her concerns are not addressed by 3pm on Thursday.
Neil Gray, who is campaign manager for Yousaf, said: “Humza’s campaign team also asked for the figures to be published and sought assurances this would be done as soon as possible.”
Members of the SNP’s ruling National Executive Committee will be asked for their views on Thursday to decide if the numbers should be published.
An SNP spokesperson rebuffed pressure to publish the data on Wednesday. They said: “Candidates have already been made aware that responsibility for the leadership election does not rest with any member of staff.”
It is understood that the party planned to release vote numbers and turnout, from which membership could be extrapolated, after the announcement of the winner.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel