A LEADING Scottish economist has described Jeremy Hunt’s promise of a “Brexit pub guarantee” as “difficult to tolerate” as business experts forecast a gloomy future for the drinks sector.
A panel of experts from Scotland’s business community on Thursday morning dissected the Chancellor’s announcement the previous day – painting a grim picture for enterprise with warnings on productivity and the rising tax burden.
Emma Congreve, deputy director at the Fraser of Allander Institute, said the drinks industry was facing major pressures as Hunt announced rising duties on alcohol – despite heralding relief in the form of his “Brexit pubs guarantee”.
She also raised fears the Scottish Government’s mooted booze advertising ban and Deposit Return Scheme could hammer the industry further.
READ MORE: Duty rise 'will be a broken system', says whisky boss and demands meeting with Hunt
Hunt told MPs yesterday that “British ale is warm but the duty on a pint is frozen” – but the drinks sector has warned that stasis on draught duty still meant soaring costs for other drinks, including wine and spirits.
The Chancellor’s measure is intended to help pubs struggling to recover from lockdown – but taxes on alcohol sold in shops and in pubs, including bottled beer are still set to rise by 10.1% - using an index linked to the current rate of inflation.
This comes on top of another tax increase for booze, linking the duty to the alcohol content, which is due to be introduced in August.
The Scotch Whisky Association said that 75% of the cost of the average-price bottle of whisky would go straight to the Treasury.
Congreve said the sector wanted “certainty”, adding: “They don’t want an over 10% rise in duty that seems to have been made okay by the draught exemption which again… the devil is in the detail.
READ MORE: Alister Jack 'regrets' lobby failure against whisky duty amid criticism from industry
“The ‘Brexit pubs guarantee’? Wrapping these things up in these banners is really difficult to tolerate."
Turning her focus to the Scottish Government’s plans for the drinks industry, she said the hospitality felt “no-one’s really listening to their concerns” – highlighting small producers’ concerns about the costs of the Deposit Return Scheme.
Host Brian Taylor, formerly of the BBC, said he felt the scheme was unlikely to exist in its planned form by the time it is introduced – if it remains at all.
He noted all SNP leadership candidates had pledged to either pause or reform the scheme if elected first minister.
Malcolm Cannon, the general manager of the Glasgow Distillery Company, said the rise in duties, on top of an increase in grain prices and energy bills “going through the roof” meant businesses in his sector were prevented from “investing in the future”.
He compared the situation to the 2008 recession – though it was confirmed on Wednesday the UK would dodge a recession this year – saying businesses were faced with “the inability, that lack of confidence in the future to be able to invest”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel