FIRST Minister Nicola Sturgeon has addressed the escalating row over the SNP leadership ballot.
It comes after Kate Forbes and Ash Regan called for independent auditors to be brought in to oversee the vote, which opened on Monday.
Sturgeon told reporters at Holyrood that she did not understand the specific concerns, and said she had “100% confidence” in the integrity of the process.
READ MORE: All the updates from the SNP leadership race as vote descends into row
The outgoing First Minister said: “The concerns, I don’t understand to be honest what the specific nature of the concerns are, but it’s incumbent on those raising these matters to be specific.
“We have a process of elections within the SNP that is not new. It hasn’t been created for this leadership election. It has been used for internal elections for some time.
“The company, MiVoice it’s called, is used by a range of membership organisations across the country … it’s an accredited organisation for trade union elections and ballots as I understand.
“It’s a tried and tested system so let’s have confidence, I have confidence, I have 100% confidence, in the integrity of that system.”
“I don’t understand what the specific nature of the concerns are” @NicolaSturgeon facing questions about the SNP leadership election process
— Alan Smith (@Political_AlanS) March 16, 2023
Kate Forbes and Ash Regan’s campaigns have called for independent auditors to be brought in pic.twitter.com/oOZdyd6tYF
Sturgeon further said that her advice to “all three of the candidates [is] to address the concerns that the people of Scotland have about the day-to-day concerns that they’re dealing with”.
“That’s how we retain the trust of the people of Scotland that, over my years of leadership, has been demonstrated in eight landslide election victories,” she added.
Deputy First Minister John Swinney also said on Thursday that he does not understand what the concerns around the SNP leadership ballot are exactly.
Speaking to BBC Radio Scotland, Swinney said: “My experience, and I have got a lot of experience of elections within the SNP, I have been a candidate in many of them, I ran many of them as the party secretary over many years.
“I have also seen this process we are going through just now operating in the election of previous deputy leaders of the party … and nobody, nobody, has raised an issue about the authority of those processes.
“They have been completely straightforward, efficient, independently organised processes, and this is exactly the same.
“So I don’t know what this is all about.”
Members of the SNP’s ruling National Executive Committee are understood to be being asked via email if they consent to the publication of the membership data.
All three leadership hopefuls, as well as a host of senior SNP figures and NEC members, have publicly backed the release of the data.
However, there has been less support for Forbes and Regan’s calls for auditors to be brought in. That instead has seen the party divided, with accusations of acting like the disgraced former US president Donald Trump being thrown around.
Forbes's statement calling for auditors said: “The SNP themselves remain ultimately accountable and responsible for many of the processes, oversight and ultimate integrity of the ballot.
“The fact that questions are being asked can only further undermine trust in SNP HQ. This is not a position I wish to see. We all agree that the party must unify around any newly elected leader.
“I have asked that the SNP appoint a robust, experienced, third-party auditor of both the ballot processes and the eventual tally of the vote. This third party must have full oversight of all membership numbers, data and processes. This should be done without delay.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel