HUMZA Yousaf has said that if his fellow leadership candidates plan on questioning the election process they need to produce “evidence” that backs up their concerns.
Both Kate Forbes and Ash Regan have called for independent auditors to be brought in to oversee the leadership vote.
On Wednesday evening Forbes’s campaign manager released a statement which cast doubt on the independent nature of the company overseeing the ballot process.
It said that the “perception” that Mi-Voice, the election services firm carrying out the ballot, was “independent” and “responsible for the entire process” was incorrect.
Instead, it claimed that “they are simply a company contracted by the SNP to provide services to their client’s specification. This is entirely different.”
We asked @HumzaYousaf how he would regain trust of party members amid the latest in the voting system row pic.twitter.com/bTEEQnhJdY
— The National (@ScotNational) March 16, 2023
However, speaking outside the Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain building in Edinburgh, Yousaf said that he would be “keen” to see evidence of Kate Forbes or Ash Regan’s concerns with the election process.
He said: “If anyone has any tangible or credible evidence of the Mi-Voice process – [that’s] the external third-party company that we’ve used for many, many years – that isn’t working or that there’s issues with then they should publish that evidence.
“I’d be very keen to see it because this is a process that is tried and tested for many years within the party.
“Mi-Voice has been used by the Electoral Reform Society, it has even been used by Wrexham FC. It’s a well-known company.
“If they have any evidence and they believe that a third-party, traditional auditor would help with that then of course I’ve got no objection.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes and Ash Regan in call for independent auditors
“I just think we shouldn’t be casting doubt on a process that has been used for many years.”
When asked by The National how he would regain the trust of members who had doubts about the party’s election apparatus if elected leader, he urged people not to question the result regardless of who wins.
“I think it’s a really important point that what we don’t do is engage in smears, particularly when there’s no credible, tangible evidence and attack a party process that has been used for years.
“Not just by the SNP, Mi-Voice is a company that has been used by many other organisations and political parties, I believe.
“We need to be really, really careful that we’re not calling into question the result, whoever the winner is.”
The SNP said that the candidates have already been made aware that the responsibility for the election “does not rest with any member of staff”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel