MICHAEL Russell, the SNP president, has taken over as the chief executive of the party following the resignation of Peter Murrell.
Murrell, outgoing first minister Nicola Sturgeon’s husband, resigned his position at the top of the SNP on Saturday.
It came after Murray Foote, the chief of communications for the SNP at Holyrood, resigned suggesting that he had been fed inaccurate information about membership data by party HQ, which he had then relayed to the media.
Murrell took responsibility for the erroneous statements, adding: “While there was no intent to mislead, I accept that this has been the outcome.”
READ MORE: SNP MP calls for inquiry after party's media chief quits amid claims HQ 'lied'
The SNP’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) confirmed on Saturday afternoon that Russell would take over the running of party HQ “on an interim and voluntary basis”.
Russell was the chief executive of the party before Murrell’s 24-year tenure. His appointment, the SNP said, will have no bearing on the leadership contest which is being overseen by national secretary Lorna Finn.
SNP MP Kirsten Oswald said in a statement: “As business convener, I called NEC to meet today to take responsibility for ensuring the overall operation of SNP headquarters and ahead of the election of a new party leader.
“NEC unanimously backed Michael Russell, our widely respected party resident and a former chief executive, to take responsibility for day-to-day operations on an interim basis until a new party leader is in place and the process of appointing a permanent replacement is complete. I am pleased to confirm that Michael has agreed to this.
“The leadership election has been overseen entirely by the national secretary Lorna Finn who is responsible for all party elections, not the chief executive, and as a result these changes have no impact on the operation of the leadership contest.
"The ballots are issued and counted by Mi-Voice, a respected independent company and voting concludes next Monday.
“Throughout this period, I thank the hard working and diligent staff at SNP HQ whose commitment to our party is second to none.”
The NEC also passed a motion affirming its confidence in the voting system being used to elect a new party leader, and calling for the process to be completed "in a positive and forward looking spirit".
The motion reads: "That the National Executive Committee authorises the party president to take responsibility in a voluntary capacity for the operation of HQ and the work of HQ staff pro tem, pending the election of a new party leader, expresses its confidence in the national secretary and her supervision of that election, the arrangements for which are robust and independent and calls on the candidates, their teams and all party members to complete the process in a positive and forward looking spirit."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel