HOME Secretary Suella Braverman is facing criticism after appearing to exclude any media which is not right-wing from a taxpayer-funded trip to Rwanda.
The top Tory landed in the central African nation on Friday, and invited journalists from outlets including GB News, the Daily Mail, the Express, and the Telegraph.
Other media which does not align with her politics, such as the Guardian, the Mirror, and the BBC, were not invited.
The Guardian said it had written to the Home Office’s permanent secretary “to ask for an explanation of how this has happened”.
Good Law Project director Jolyon Maugham tweeted about one piece of "party political propaganda" that has come out of the trip, highlighting a story from the Telegraph about Braverman saying she could "use interior designer behind Rwanda migrant homes".
Doesn't seem right to me that taxpayers should pay the costs of this party political propaganda. pic.twitter.com/1dpdVvOO7I
— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) March 18, 2023
A Home Office spokesperson said BBC Africa were meeting the Home Secretary in Rwanda, although no one from the UK operation had been invited.
They also insisted that the invited media had paid their own way.
READ MORE: UK Government bid to send migrants to Rwanda is lawful, court rules
The outlet said in statement: “We are deeply concerned to learn that – once again – journalists from the Guardian and other news organisations appear to have been excluded from reporting on a taxpayer-funded trip to Rwanda to discuss a flagship government policy.
“Excluding journalists who provide scrutiny of key policies is not only damaging to press freedom, which the UK Government claims to champion, but may also contravene the government’s own propriety guidance on dealing impartially and evenhandedly with members of the media.”
Index on Censorship editor at large Martin Bright said: “We are concerned to hear that journalists from organisations judged to be critical of the government’s immigration policy have not been invited … Democracy depends on an open and transparent relationship between government and the media, where all journalists are able to scrutinise the government.
“Index on Censorship believes that access to government ministers, both domestically and as part of international visits, should not be treated as a reward for favourable coverage.”
Braverman embarked on her first full day in Rwanda as Home Secretary on Saturday as she set out to reaffirm her commitment to the UK Government’s deportation policy.
No migrants have been relocated to the country so far as the deal, which was signed last April by Braverman’s predecessor Priti Patel, remains embroiled in legal battles.
Ahead of her trip, the Home Secretary said the plan “will act as a powerful deterrent against dangerous and illegal journeys”.
Braverman is due to meet President Paul Kagame and her counterpart Vincent Biruta to discuss the deal.
She will also meet with investment start-up professionals and entrepreneurs, to discuss the range of business and employment opportunities available in Rwanda.
The Government’s plan to forcibly remove migrants to the African nation is currently grounded by the courts – with asylum seekers being told on Tuesday they could appeal against Home Office decisions to relocate them.
A group of individuals from countries including Iran, Iraq and Syria are aiming to overturn rulings made by two High Court judges in December – who dismissed a series of legal bids against the Government’s plan.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel