IMAGES of Suella Braverman on her visit to Rwanda have been described as something similar to “an extremely distasteful and disturbing holiday album”.
No migrants have yet been relocated to the country, despite the Home Secretary previously saying it was her “dream” to see a plane carrying some there.
Braverman has just expanded the agreement with Rwanda to incorporate entrants to the UK irrespective of the claim they bring – including asylum, modern slavery or human rights.
One of the images (below) of her visit show her laughing as she toured a building site to see the construction of housing which could eventually be used for deported migrants.
The Scottish Greens justice and human rights spokesperson Maggie Chapman said: “Even by the racist and authoritarian standards of the Tory party, this Home Secretary has plunged to terrible and inhumane new lows.
“The grinning photos from the ‘processing centres’ in Rwanda are grotesque – they’re like something out of an extremely distasteful and disturbing holiday album.
“But they are nothing compared to the pain and misery that this awful government, and this Home Office, is knowingly inflicting on some of the world’s most vulnerable people.”
Speaking from the Rwandan capital of Kigali, Braverman said that the Illegal Migration Bill (IMB) would not take the UK out of the European Convention on Human Rights.
However, she added that there are “serious issues with the balance that’s currently being struck” with the Strasbourg courts.
“I think that Rwanda is clearly ready. We’re seeing that there’s real progress, which has been made in real tangible terms.”
Chapman added: “Like the anti-refugee bill, the immoral and illegal Rwanda deportation plan is the sort of policy that the BNP could only dream of. No government that had a shred of concern for the wellbeing of refugees would even consider either of them.
“The hostile environment that they are part of is not new, and has been built over decades, by both Tory and Labour governments.
“History will judge these actions and the rhetoric used to justify them, in the most contemptuous terms. It is long past time for us to abolish the Home Office and build a whole new approach based on solidarity, support and compassion.”
Braverman was also asked whether she was in discussions with other nations to enter into further partnerships in order to implement the IMB.
She said: “As you’ve heard, the capacity for Rwanda is in the region of thousands. We believe that is sufficient to deal with the challenge that we’re facing in the UK, but we are always in constructive dialogue with many nations around the world.”
READ MORE: Rise of the far right: 'UK has parallels with Trump's America'
The SNP meanwhile condemned the policy. The party’s home affairs spokesperson Alison Thewliss said: “The Rwanda policy is callous to its core and should never have seen the light of day.
“The SNP has been clear from the outset that we want no part in this immoral and impractical policy.
“There can be no doubt that the only way to build an asylum system which offers refugees protection and security is through independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel