FORMER chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has said that he found out via Twitter that he was being sacked.
The MP for Spelthorne was sacked following the announcement of his mini-Budget while Liz Truss was still prime minister.
Speaking to Camilla Tominey on GB News, Kwarteng admitted his financial plans should have followed a “more methodical approach” and that not involving the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was “probably a mistake”.
Reflecting on his time in government, Kwarteng said: “I’m fine actually, I look back on my time in government and I wasn’t just chancellor, I was business secretary before that, and it was a great privilege to be in that position. I was sacked, but that’s politics, there are ups and downs.
‘I’m not in the business of apologising for everything...'
— GB News (@GBNEWS) March 19, 2023
In an exclusive interview with @CamillaTominey, Kwasi Kwarteng said he ‘regrets what happened’ but refused to apologise about the rise in mortgage rates.
🖥 GB News on YouTube https://t.co/Wa58gYGZwF pic.twitter.com/ecaV4qujLl
“I found out on Twitter on the way to Downing Street. That was an odd feeling because as I remember it was Steve Swinford from The Times and formerly The Telegraph.
“My special adviser said to me ‘have you seen Steven’s tweet’. And I said ‘no’ and she passed it on to me and it said Kwasi Kwarteng has been or will be sacked. That was pretty definitive.”
The mini-Budget sent the value of the pound tumbling while simultaneously pushing up mortgage rates last autumn.
Kwarteng said that he “regrets what happened” but refused to apologise to those who felt the effects of his ill-fated plans.
He said: “I said publicly, I’m not in the business of apologising for everything. I mean, if politicians apologise for everything that goes wrong, then we’ll be here for the rest of time. I regret what happened.
READ MORE: SNP members react to shock resignations at top of party
“I think we should have been more methodical. I don’t think everything I did was right. I look back and think, what could we have done better.
“But I’m very much trying to look forward to actually fighting for the low tax economy that I want to see.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel